public meat and poultry company

Tyson Foods

Industry Food

A large public meat and poultry producer whose core business is industrial animal protein, meat processing, and packaged food production. Tyson Foods scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and toxic or materially harmful products, with centralized governance and weak worker power reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: Tyson is a weak food choice because its ordinary business model combines hazardous meat-processing labor, industrial animal agriculture, and repeated regulatory or legal problems.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 10, 2026

Final Score -18* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-18 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material18

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap18

Penalties-36

Private Government badge

Tyson Foods receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $1.4M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [10]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Human Harm.

Strengths

Extraction3/10
Market Conduct3/5
Product Integrity3/5

Penalties

Human Harm-8
Ecological Harm-8
High-Carbon Products-7
Policy Capture-6

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims10
Direct axis claims9
Coverage9/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. That keeps Tyson Foods low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. That keeps Tyson Foods low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. [1]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. That keeps Tyson Foods low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. [1] context The U.S. Department of Labor obtained a nationwide injunction requiring Tyson to pay poultry workers for time spent donning, doffing, sanitizing, and moving between tasks. [2] context Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. That keeps Tyson Foods low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. [1] context The U.S. Department of Labor obtained a nationwide injunction requiring Tyson to pay poultry workers for time spent donning, doffing, sanitizing, and moving between tasks. [2] context Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. That keeps Tyson Foods low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. [1] context The U.S. Department of Labor obtained a nationwide injunction requiring Tyson to pay poultry workers for time spent donning, doffing, sanitizing, and moving between tasks. [2] context Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. That keeps Tyson Foods low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. [1] context The U.S. Department of Labor obtained a nationwide injunction requiring Tyson to pay poultry workers for time spent donning, doffing, sanitizing, and moving between tasks. [2] context Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. That places Tyson Foods in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. [3] context Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. [1] context Tyson’s legal and regulatory record creates material consumer opacity because ordinary packaging does not surface the labor and environmental risks embedded in the product. [4]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. That places Tyson Foods in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. [3] context Tyson’s core products are industrial meat and processed meat products; ordinary consumption and production carry food-safety, saturated-fat, zoonotic, and processing-risk concerns, describes conduct considered under Toxic Products. [5]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. That places Tyson Foods in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities. [1] context Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental. [3] context The Department of Justice reported that Tyson Poultry was fined for Clean Water Act violations tied to a discharge that caused a large fish kill and required independent environmental auditing. [6]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-8	The U.S. Department of Labor obtained a nationwide injunction requiring Tyson to pay poultry workers for time spent donning, doffing, sanitizing, and moving between tasks. The U.S. Department of Labor obtained a nationwide injunction requiring Tyson to pay poultry workers for time spent donning, doffing, sanitizing, and moving between tasks. That warrants a substantial Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence The U.S. Department of Labor obtained a nationwide injunction requiring Tyson to pay poultry workers for time spent donning, doffing, sanitizing, and moving between tasks. [2]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-8	Tyson Foods sits in the material Ecological Harm range because Clean Water Act violations, a fish kill, animal agriculture, and large-scale processing create ecological burdens beyond ordinary food retail. Linked evidence The Department of Justice reported that Tyson Poultry was fined for Clean Water Act violations tied to a discharge that caused a large fish kill and required independent environmental auditing. [6]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-6	OpenLobby records TYSON FOODS INC lobbying on agriculture, food, labor, tax, trade with about $1.4M in spending across 23 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. OpenLobby records TYSON FOODS INC lobbying on agriculture, food, labor, tax, trade with about $1.4M in spending across 23 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records TYSON FOODS INC lobbying on agriculture, food, labor, tax, trade with about $1.4M in spending across 23 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [8]
High-Carbon Products ? Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly. Range: -10 to 0.	-7	Meat, dairy, and industrial animal-protein products have unusually high climate burden relative to plant-based alternatives; when they are central to the model, the penalty belongs in the core tier. Linked evidence Tyson Foods has animal-agriculture core high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A large public meat and poultry producer whose core business is industrial animal protein, meat processing, and packaged food production. Tyson Foods scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and tox… [9]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	Tyson’s core products are industrial meat and processed meat products; ordinary consumption and production carry food-safety, saturated-fat, zoonotic, and processing-risk concerns, describes conduct considered under Toxic Products. Tyson’s core products are industrial meat and processed meat products; ordinary consumption and production carry food-safety, saturated-fat, zoonotic, and processing-risk concerns, describes conduct considered under Toxic Products. That warrants a severe Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence Tyson’s core products are industrial meat and processed meat products; ordinary consumption and production carry food-safety, saturated-fat, zoonotic, and processing-risk concerns, describes conduct considered under Toxic Products. [5]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Tyson’s legal and regulatory record creates material consumer opacity because ordinary packaging does not surface the labor and environmental risks embedded in the product. Tyson’s legal and regulatory record creates material consumer opacity because ordinary packaging does not surface the labor and environmental risks embedded in the product. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence Tyson’s legal and regulatory record creates material consumer opacity because ordinary packaging does not surface the labor and environmental risks embedded in the product. [4]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Tyson presents itself through ordinary food-company language while the meat-processing record shows structurally political choices about labor, animals, and pollution being naturalized as normal food production. Tyson presents itself through ordinary food-company language while the meat-processing record shows structurally political choices about labor, animals, and pollution being naturalized as normal food production. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Tyson presents itself through ordinary food-company language while the meat-processing record shows structurally political choices about labor, animals, and pollution being naturalized as normal food production. [7]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 74/100

9 verified linked claims 9 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 9/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

9 verified linked claims

Source quality 13/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

9 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

9/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Tyson Foods is a public company whose control is shareholder-facing rather than organized around workers, animals, consumers, or affected communities.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Tyson Foods investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

2The U.S. Department of Labor obtained a nationwide injunction requiring Tyson to pay poultry workers for time spent donning, doffing, sanitizing, and moving between tasks.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

U.S. Department of Labor Tyson injunctionPrimary public record · 100%

3Tyson’s core business is large-scale chicken, beef, pork, and prepared foods, making industrial animal protein central rather than incidental.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Tyson Foods company overviewGeneral web source · 58%

4Tyson’s legal and regulatory record creates material consumer opacity because ordinary packaging does not surface the labor and environmental risks embedded in the product.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

DOJ: Tyson Poultry fined for Clean Water Act violationPrimary public record · 100%
U.S. Department of Labor Tyson injunctionPrimary public record · 100%

5Tyson’s core products are industrial meat and processed meat products; ordinary consumption and production carry food-safety, saturated-fat, zoonotic, and processing-risk concerns, describes conduct considered under Toxic Products.

Toxic Products Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Tyson Foods productsGeneral web source · 58%

6The Department of Justice reported that Tyson Poultry was fined for Clean Water Act violations tied to a discharge that caused a large fish kill and required independent environmental auditing.

Ecological Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

DOJ: Tyson Poultry fined for Clean Water Act violationPrimary public record · 100%

7Tyson presents itself through ordinary food-company language while the meat-processing record shows structurally political choices about labor, animals, and pollution being naturalized as normal food production.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Tyson Foods company overviewGeneral web source · 58%

8OpenLobby records TYSON FOODS INC lobbying on agriculture, food, labor, tax, trade with about $1.4M in spending across 23 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — TYSON FOODS INC lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

9Tyson Foods has animal-agriculture core high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A large public meat and poultry producer whose core business is industrial animal protein, meat processing, and packaged food production. Tyson Foods scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and tox…

High Carbon Products Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 11, 2026

Tyson Foods public siteGeneral web source · 58%
Our World in Data: Environmental Impacts of Food ProductionGeneral web source · 58%

10Tyson Foods receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $1.4M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — TYSON FOODS INC lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD61 Three Stone Hearth worker-owned community-supported kitchen · same market AGOOD60 Cheese Board Collective worker cooperative · same market AGOOD60 ChiFresh Kitchen worker-owned prepared-meal cooperative · same market AGOOD59 Alvarado Street Bakery worker-owned bakery · same market AGOOD59 Arizmendi Bakery worker cooperative bakery · same market AGOOD59 Rainbow Grocery Cooperative worker cooperative grocer · same market AGOOD58 Equal Exchange worker cooperative · same market AGOOD58 Niles Pie Company worker-owned pie shop and bakery · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Tyson Foods Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log