nonprofit independent-author association and watchdog
Alliance of Independent Authors
Industry Publishing
A nonprofit membership association for independent authors, providing advocacy, education, watchdog guidance, and self-publishing standards. ALLi scores well because it helps writers navigate the market without becoming another extraction gate.
Why this matters: ALLi is a strong author-side institution: it helps authors avoid predatory services and improves self-publishing standards, though membership governance and scale are not fully public.
Letter grade B Qualified Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
B - Qualified
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.
Strengths
- Extraction7/10
- Ownership6/10
- Governance6/10
Penalties
- Reversibility-5
- Accountability Opacity-2
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims9
- Direct axis claims8
- Coverage8/15
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
The Alliance of Independent Authors is a nonprofit author association rather than a publishing platform owned by retailers or investors. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
The Alliance of Independent Authors is a nonprofit author association rather than a publishing platform owned by retailers or investors. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
7 / 10 |
The Alliance of Independent Authors is a nonprofit author association rather than a publishing platform owned by retailers or investors. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
The Alliance of Independent Authors is a nonprofit author association rather than a publishing platform owned by retailers or investors. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
6 / 7 |
The Alliance of Independent Authors is a nonprofit author association rather than a publishing platform owned by retailers or investors. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
The Alliance of Independent Authors is a nonprofit author association rather than a publishing platform owned by retailers or investors. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 |
The Alliance of Independent Authors is a nonprofit author association rather than a publishing platform owned by retailers or investors. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
ALLi provides education, advocacy, watchdog ratings, ethics guidance, and standards for independent authors. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
4 / 5 |
The Alliance of Independent Authors is a nonprofit author association rather than a publishing platform owned by retailers or investors. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Reversibility
?
Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders,
founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather
than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
ALLi’s goodness depends on association leadership and watchdog rigor rather than hard public control. Linked evidence
|
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability
structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
|
-2 |
Internal association operations and review methods are only partly transparent. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
1 / 3 |
ALLi’s watchdog work supports author dissent against predatory and opaque publishing services. Linked evidence
|
Constitutional Spirit
?
Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms
even where private law does not strictly require it.
|
1 / 3 |
Author advocacy and independent publishing standards support a pluralistic public sphere. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
2 / 3 |
ALLi provides practical author guidance and watchdog information with strong public and member value. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
2 / 3 |
ALLi’s watchdog and service ratings improve author visibility into costs and service quality. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 67/100
9 verified linked claims 8 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 8/15 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
9 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 9/18
8 direct claims across 15 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
8/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1The Alliance of Independent Authors is a nonprofit author association rather than a publishing platform owned by retailers or investors.
- Alliance of Independent AuthorsGeneral web source · 58%
- ALLi watchdogGeneral web source · 58%
2ALLi provides education, advocacy, watchdog ratings, ethics guidance, and standards for independent authors.
- Alliance of Independent AuthorsGeneral web source · 58%
- ALLi watchdogGeneral web source · 58%
3ALLi materially improves the author-service market by warning authors about bad providers and raising self-publishing standards.
- Alliance of Independent AuthorsGeneral web source · 58%
- ALLi watchdogGeneral web source · 58%
4ALLi’s watchdog work supports author dissent against predatory and opaque publishing services.
- Alliance of Independent AuthorsGeneral web source · 58%
- ALLi watchdogGeneral web source · 58%
5Author advocacy and independent publishing standards support a pluralistic public sphere.
- Alliance of Independent AuthorsGeneral web source · 58%
- ALLi watchdogGeneral web source · 58%
6ALLi provides practical author guidance and watchdog information with strong public and member value.
- Alliance of Independent AuthorsGeneral web source · 58%
- ALLi watchdogGeneral web source · 58%
7ALLi’s watchdog and service ratings improve author visibility into costs and service quality.
- Alliance of Independent AuthorsGeneral web source · 58%
- ALLi watchdogGeneral web source · 58%
8ALLi’s goodness depends on association leadership and watchdog rigor rather than hard public control.
- Alliance of Independent AuthorsGeneral web source · 58%
- ALLi watchdogGeneral web source · 58%
9Internal association operations and review methods are only partly transparent.
- Alliance of Independent AuthorsGeneral web source · 58%
- ALLi watchdogGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Alliance of Independent Authors Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log