nonprofit open-source publishing platform
Ghost Foundation
Industry Publishing
A nonprofit open-source publishing platform for independent publishers, newsletters, memberships, and websites. Ghost scores among the best author-platform entries because it gives publishers durable infrastructure without locking them into a closed attention platform.
Why this matters: Ghost is an A author-publishing infrastructure entry: open-source, nonprofit, low-lock-in, and built for independent publishing rather than attention capture.
Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
A - Good
The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.
Strengths
- Ownership8/10
- Extraction8/10
- Governance7/10
Penalties
- Reversibility-5
- Accountability Opacity-2
- Ecological Harm-1
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims10
- Direct axis claims9
- Coverage9/16
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
8 / 10 |
Ghost is organized around a nonprofit foundation/open-source model rather than a venture-backed social platform. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
7 / 10 |
Ghost is organized around a nonprofit foundation/open-source model rather than a venture-backed social platform. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
8 / 10 |
Ghost is organized around a nonprofit foundation/open-source model rather than a venture-backed social platform. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
6 / 7 |
Ghost is organized around a nonprofit foundation/open-source model rather than a venture-backed social platform. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
6 / 7 |
Ghost is organized around a nonprofit foundation/open-source model rather than a venture-backed social platform. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
Ghost is organized around a nonprofit foundation/open-source model rather than a venture-backed social platform. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 |
Ghost is organized around a nonprofit foundation/open-source model rather than a venture-backed social platform. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
Ghost provides open-source publishing, newsletter, membership, and website infrastructure for independent publishers. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
5 / 5 |
Ghost is organized around a nonprofit foundation/open-source model rather than a venture-backed social platform. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Reversibility
?
Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders,
founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather
than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
Hosted-service governance and foundation leadership remain partially reversible. Linked evidence
|
Ecological Harm
?
Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale,
including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued
after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.
|
-1 |
Hosting infrastructure creates modest ecological impacts. Linked evidence
|
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability
structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
|
-2 |
Foundation and hosted-service economics are more legible than most platforms but not fully transparent. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
1 / 3 |
Open publishing infrastructure supports independent speech and dissent outside major platforms. Linked evidence
|
Constitutional Spirit
?
Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms
even where private law does not strictly require it.
|
2 / 3 |
Open-source independent publishing tools support civil-liberties and public-sphere norms. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
3 / 3 |
Ghost provides durable, portable publishing infrastructure with strong value for publishers. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
2 / 3 |
Open-source code and public pricing create meaningful cost and platform legibility. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 67/100
10 verified linked claims 9 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 9/16 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
10 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 9/18
9 direct claims across 16 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 6/10
9/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1Ghost is organized around a nonprofit foundation/open-source model rather than a venture-backed social platform.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
2Ghost provides open-source publishing, newsletter, membership, and website infrastructure for independent publishers.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
3Ghost materially enables independent publishing with lower lock-in and less attention extraction than social platforms, though hosted services and governance are not fully democratic.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
4Open publishing infrastructure supports independent speech and dissent outside major platforms.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
5Open-source independent publishing tools support civil-liberties and public-sphere norms.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
6Ghost provides durable, portable publishing infrastructure with strong value for publishers.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
7Open-source code and public pricing create meaningful cost and platform legibility.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
8Hosted-service governance and foundation leadership remain partially reversible.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
9Hosting infrastructure creates modest ecological impacts.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
10Foundation and hosted-service economics are more legible than most platforms but not fully transparent.
- GhostGeneral web source · 58%
- Ghost open sourceGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Ghost Foundation Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log