nonprofit public-interest book publisher

The New Press

A nonprofit public-interest book publisher focused on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and social change. The New Press scores as a strong B publisher because the books are mission-driven and union-adjacent, though governance is not worker- or author-controlled.

Why this matters: The New Press is a high-B book publisher: nonprofit mission, public-interest catalog, and union affiliation beat commercial trade publishing, but donor/board governance and ideological concentration keep it below worker-owned publishers.

Letter grade B Qualified Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 8, 2026

Final Score 47* B - Qualified

BQUALIFIED47 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material50

Bonus+7

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap57

Penalties-10

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

B - Qualified

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.

Strengths

Ownership7/10
Extraction7/10
Governance6/10

Penalties

Reversibility-5
Accountability Opacity-2
Identity Capture-2
Ecological Harm-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims12
Direct axis claims10
Coverage10/17

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	7 / 10	The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. That places The New Press in the middle of Ownership: there is some mission, member, producer, or public-interest constraint, but decisive control is not fully democratic. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence The New Press describes itself as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	6 / 10	The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. That places The New Press in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence context The New Press describes itself as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. [1] context The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. [2] context The New Press reinvests book revenue into a not-for-profit mission and uses books to facilitate social change, but governance remains nonprofit-institutional rather than democratic stakeholder control. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	7 / 10	The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. That places The New Press in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence context The New Press describes itself as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. [1] context The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. [2] context The New Press reinvests book revenue into a not-for-profit mission and uses books to facilitate social change, but governance remains nonprofit-institutional rather than democratic stakeholder control. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	5 / 7	The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. That places The New Press in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence context The New Press describes itself as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. [1] context The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. [2] context The New Press reinvests book revenue into a not-for-profit mission and uses books to facilitate social change, but governance remains nonprofit-institutional rather than democratic stakeholder control. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	6 / 7	The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. That places The New Press high on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the institution materially supports people outside ordinary employment rather than treating exit as abandonment. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence context The New Press describes itself as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. [1] context The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. [2] context The New Press reinvests book revenue into a not-for-profit mission and uses books to facilitate social change, but governance remains nonprofit-institutional rather than democratic stakeholder control. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	6 / 7	The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. That places The New Press high on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: the institution is structured to absorb real costs rather than shifting losses onto weaker parties. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence context The New Press describes itself as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. [1] context The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. [2] context The New Press reinvests book revenue into a not-for-profit mission and uses books to facilitate social change, but governance remains nonprofit-institutional rather than democratic stakeholder control. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. That places The New Press high on Market Conduct: pricing, access, switching, and bargaining practices show restraint compared with ordinary rent-seeking competitors. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence context The New Press describes itself as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. [1] context The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. [2] context The New Press reinvests book revenue into a not-for-profit mission and uses books to facilitate social change, but governance remains nonprofit-institutional rather than democratic stakeholder control. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. That places The New Press high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. [2]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	4 / 5	The linked record identifies The New Press as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence context The New Press describes itself as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house. [1] context The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects. [2] context The New Press reinvests book revenue into a not-for-profit mission and uses books to facilitate social change, but governance remains nonprofit-institutional rather than democratic stakeholder control. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	The New Press depends on nonprofit leadership, donors, and editorial direction rather than a hard democratic ownership lock. The New Press depends on nonprofit leadership, donors, and editorial direction rather than a hard democratic ownership lock. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence The New Press depends on nonprofit leadership, donors, and editorial direction rather than a hard democratic ownership lock. [8]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-1	Physical book production and distribution create modest ecological impacts. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence Physical book production and distribution create modest ecological impacts. [9]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	The New Press describes its nonprofit public-interest mission, but author economics, internal governance, and complete publishing economics are only partly public. The New Press describes its nonprofit public-interest mission, but author economics, internal governance, and complete publishing economics are only partly public. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence The New Press describes its nonprofit public-interest mission, but author economics, internal governance, and complete publishing economics are only partly public. [10]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	The New Press has an explicit progressive identity, which creates some audience identity clustering despite its public-interest value. The New Press has an explicit progressive identity, which creates some audience identity clustering despite its public-interest value. That warrants a substantial Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence The New Press has an explicit progressive identity, which creates some audience identity clustering despite its public-interest value. [11]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	2 / 3	The New Press publishes books that amplify progressive and critical voices and challenge mainstream narratives. The New Press publishes books that amplify progressive and critical voices and challenge mainstream narratives. That supports partial Openness to Dissent credit because people can criticize, dissent, or challenge the institution without being managed into silence. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence The New Press publishes books that amplify progressive and critical voices and challenge mainstream narratives. [4]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	Public-interest publishing on democracy, equity, law, and rights supports a pluralistic civic sphere. Public-interest publishing on democracy, equity, law, and rights supports a pluralistic civic sphere. That supports partial Constitutional Spirit credit because the institution respects speech, privacy, due process, conscience, or civil-liberties norms beyond bare legal compulsion. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence Public-interest publishing on democracy, equity, law, and rights supports a pluralistic civic sphere. [5]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	2 / 3	The New Press creates public value by publishing politically challenging books that commercial publishers may under-resource. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence The New Press creates public value by publishing politically challenging books that commercial publishers may under-resource. [6]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	The New Press explains its nonprofit model and donor reliance, but author economics and full internal finances are only partly legible. The New Press explains its nonprofit model and donor reliance, but author economics and full internal finances are only partly legible. That supports partial Cost Transparency credit because pricing, margins, fees, funding, or surplus allocation are made meaningfully legible. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Positive book-publisher search; calibrated against existing trade, academic, nonprofit, worker-owned, author-owned, and self-publishing entries. Uncertainty Focused positive-publisher pass; later review should add direct author-contract, labor, pricing, financial, and governance-document evidence. Linked evidence The New Press explains its nonprofit model and donor reliance, but author economics and full internal finances are only partly legible. [7]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 67/100

12 verified linked claims 10 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 10/17 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

12 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

10 direct claims across 17 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

10/17 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1The New Press describes itself as a nonprofit public-interest book publisher rather than an investor-owned publishing house.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

2The New Press publishes books for general readers on criminal justice, education, labor, immigration, racial equity, democracy, and related public-interest subjects.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

3The New Press reinvests book revenue into a not-for-profit mission and uses books to facilitate social change, but governance remains nonprofit-institutional rather than democratic stakeholder control.

Calculation Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

4The New Press publishes books that amplify progressive and critical voices and challenge mainstream narratives.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

5Public-interest publishing on democracy, equity, law, and rights supports a pluralistic civic sphere.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

6The New Press creates public value by publishing politically challenging books that commercial publishers may under-resource.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

7The New Press explains its nonprofit model and donor reliance, but author economics and full internal finances are only partly legible.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

8The New Press depends on nonprofit leadership, donors, and editorial direction rather than a hard democratic ownership lock.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

9Physical book production and distribution create modest ecological impacts.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

10The New Press describes its nonprofit public-interest mission, but author economics, internal governance, and complete publishing economics are only partly public.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

11The New Press has an explicit progressive identity, which creates some audience identity clustering despite its public-interest value.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

12The New Press's public materials state a mission, values, ownership model, advocacy role, or institutional standpoint plainly enough that this record does not identify penalty-level neutrality theater.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

The New Press Our StoryGeneral web source · 58%
The New Press official siteGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD60 Bookshare / Benetech nonprofit accessible-ebook library · same market AGOOD59 Creative Commons international nonprofit commons steward · same market AGOOD57 Internet Archive nonprofit digital library · same market AGOOD56 AK Press worker-owned independent book publisher and distributor · same market AGOOD56 Ghost Foundation nonprofit open-source publishing platform · same market AGOOD55 Little Free Library nonprofit neighborhood book-sharing network · same market AGOOD54 Consumer Reports independent nonprofit member organization · same market AGOOD53 Wikimedia Foundation nonprofit · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for The New Press Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 8, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding positive-publisher-expansion

Added during search for A/B-worthy true book publishers and self-publishing alternatives.

View Full Audit Log