book-writing and formatting software
Atticus
Industry Publishing
Web-based writing and book-formatting software for independent authors. Atticus has author-infrastructure value because it improves production capacity, though hosted dependence makes it less durable than local tools.
Why this matters: Atticus matters as author infrastructure because it sells useful production software without taking rights or royalties, though hosted and proprietary dependence remain.
Letter grade B Qualified Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
This entry is classified as a small business using observable scale signals: independent control, local or limited operations, and no evidence of public-company or national-chain scale. The small-business calibration keeps the ordinary rubric but reads evidence at person scale: living-wage pricing is not extraction by itself, while worker and contractor treatment, owner surplus, transparency, advertising pressure, dissent tolerance, and recourse matter more. Harm, toxicity, surveillance, labor, coercion, opacity, and hidden-parent penalties are not relaxed.
Applied cap: No structure cap
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
B - Qualified
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.
Strengths
- Extraction7/10
- Loss-Bearing Fidelity6/7
- Governance5/10
Penalties
- Reversibility-5
- Accountability Opacity-2
- Surveillance Capture-1
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims9
- Direct axis claims7
- Coverage7/14
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
4 / 10 |
Atticus is private proprietary author software rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
5 / 10 |
Atticus is private proprietary author software rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
7 / 10 |
Atticus is private proprietary author software rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
Atticus is private proprietary author software rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
5 / 7 |
Atticus is private proprietary author software rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
Atticus is private proprietary author software rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 |
Atticus is private proprietary author software rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
Atticus provides writing and formatting tools for independent authors. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
4 / 5 |
Atticus is private proprietary author software rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Reversibility
?
Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders,
founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather
than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
Access depends on proprietary software continuity and account/service decisions. Linked evidence
|
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability
structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
|
-2 |
Internal economics and roadmap are not fully transparent. Linked evidence
|
Surveillance Capture
?
Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial
recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of
customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-1 |
Hosted writing software and accounts involve some user data exposure. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
2 / 3 |
Atticus provides useful writing/formatting value through a clear one-time pricing model. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
2 / 3 |
Atticus publishes pricing plainly. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 66/100
9 verified linked claims 7 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 7/14 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
9 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 9/18
7 direct claims across 14 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
7/14 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1Atticus is private proprietary author software rather than author-owned infrastructure.
- AtticusGeneral web source · 58%
- Atticus pricingGeneral web source · 58%
2Atticus provides writing and formatting tools for independent authors.
- AtticusGeneral web source · 58%
- Atticus pricingGeneral web source · 58%
3Atticus gives authors practical production capacity without taking book rights or royalties, but it is still proprietary hosted software.
- AtticusGeneral web source · 58%
- Atticus pricingGeneral web source · 58%
4Atticus provides useful writing/formatting value through a clear one-time pricing model.
- AtticusGeneral web source · 58%
- Atticus pricingGeneral web source · 58%
5Atticus publishes pricing plainly.
- AtticusGeneral web source · 58%
- Atticus pricingGeneral web source · 58%
6Access depends on proprietary software continuity and account/service decisions.
- AtticusGeneral web source · 58%
- Atticus pricingGeneral web source · 58%
7Internal economics and roadmap are not fully transparent.
- AtticusGeneral web source · 58%
- Atticus pricingGeneral web source · 58%
8Hosted writing software and accounts involve some user data exposure.
- AtticusGeneral web source · 58%
- Atticus pricingGeneral web source · 58%
9Atticus's public materials state a mission, values, ownership model, advocacy role, or institutional standpoint plainly enough that this record does not identify penalty-level neutrality theater.
- Atticus official siteGeneral web source · 58%
- Atticus pricingGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Atticus Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log