centralized religious corporation

Church of Scientology

A centralized Scientology institution combining religious identity, paid courses, auditing, media, legal defense, and Sea Org labor structures. It scores near the bottom among present religious institutions because high-control exit costs, litigation posture, labor allegations, paid advancement, and identity capture dominate the evaluation.

Why this matters: Scientology is a key non-state calibration point for paid religious hierarchy and high-control organization.

Letter grade F Malignant High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 14, 2026

Final Score -48* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-48 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material5

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap5

Penalties-53

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Scale Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Human Harm.

Strengths

Scale Integrity3/5
Extraction1/10
Product Integrity1/5

Penalties

Human Harm-12
Debt Peonage-8
Reversibility-5
Policy Capture-5

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims20
Direct axis claims20
Coverage20/20

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	0 / 10	No Ownership value is applied to Church of Scientology on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology is governed as an institutional religious body rather than by worker, member-consumer, or affected-community ownership. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	0 / 10	No Governance value is applied to Church of Scientology on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Scientology governance is centralized through church corporate structures, senior leadership, and discipline systems rather than democratic control by ordinary members or ex-members. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	1 / 10	Church of Scientology sits at 1 on Extraction because church of Scientology's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people.. Church of Scientology sits at 1 on Extraction because church of Scientology's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	0 / 7	No Labor Sovereignty value is applied to Church of Scientology on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with limited worker sovereignty compared with co-determined or worker-owned institutions. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	0 / 7	No Solidarity Unemployed value is applied to Church of Scientology on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's public record shows some ministry, charity, or mutual-aid orientation, but not a universal structural guarantee for people outside paid work. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	0 / 7	No Loss Bearing Fidelity value is applied to Church of Scientology on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion. [6]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	0 / 5	No Market Conduct value is applied to Church of Scientology on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology is not an ordinary seller, but it controls access to religious community, services, identity, donations, or institutional recognition. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	1 / 5	Church of Scientology sits at 1 on Product Integrity because scientology sells courses, auditing, training, and religious services, but product integrity is weak because advancement and belonging are bound to costly institutional dependency.. Church of Scientology sits at 1 on Product Integrity because scientology sells courses, auditing, training, and religious services, but product integrity is weak because advancement and belonging are bound to costly institutional dependency.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Scientology sells courses, auditing, training, and religious services, but product integrity is weak because advancement and belonging are bound to costly institutional dependency. [8]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Church of Scientology sits at 3 on Scale Integrity because church of Scientology's scale gives it public importance and service capacity, while also magnifying hierarchy, opacity, and identity pressure.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's scale gives it public importance and service capacity, while also magnifying hierarchy, opacity, and identity pressure. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Church of Scientology is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because church of Scientology's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or… Church of Scientology is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because church of Scientology's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control. [10]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-12	Church of Scientology is penalized at -12 on Human Harm because litigation over Sea Org conditions and public controversy around coercive control make human harm material even where some claims have been litigated within religious-freedom defenses.. Church of Scientology is penalized at -12 on Human Harm because litigation over Sea Org conditions and public controversy around coercive control make human harm material even where some claims have been litigated within religious-freedom defenses.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Litigation over Sea Org conditions and public controversy around coercive control make human harm material even where some claims have been litigated within religious-freedom defenses. [11]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-4	Church of Scientology is penalized at -4 on Coercive Violence because church of Scientology's current record does not show direct institutional killing or armed coercion at the level of the historical violent religious-state cases in this pass.. Church of Scientology is penalized at -4 on Coercive Violence because church of Scientology's current record does not show direct institutional killing or armed coercion at the level of the historical violent religious-state cases in this pass.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's current record does not show direct institutional killing or armed coercion at the level of the historical violent religious-state cases in this pass. [12]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-5	Church of Scientology is penalized at -5 on Policy Capture because church of Scientology participates in public moral, legal, policy, or cultural advocacy where religious authority can shape civic rules affecting nonmembers.. Church of Scientology is penalized at -5 on Policy Capture because church of Scientology participates in public moral, legal, policy, or cultural advocacy where religious authority can shape civic rules affecting nonmembers.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology participates in public moral, legal, policy, or cultural advocacy where religious authority can shape civic rules affecting nonmembers. [13]
Debt Peonage ? Coercive or structurally inescapable debt systems, including bankruptcy-resistant student debt, compelled servicing relationships, wage or benefit garnishment leverage, distressed-debt buying, debt collection, or refinancing practices that turn education, medical care, housing, household necessity, or public obligation into long-term debtor control. Ordinary transparent lending is not penalized by itself. Range: -12 to 0.	-8	Church of Scientology is penalized at -8 on Debt Peonage because church of Scientology's record in this pass does not show a core debtor-control model comparable with bankruptcy-resistant lending, debt collection, or compelled servicing systems.. Church of Scientology is penalized at -8 on Debt Peonage because church of Scientology's record in this pass does not show a core debtor-control model comparable with bankruptcy-resistant lending, debt collection, or compelled servicing systems.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's record in this pass does not show a core debtor-control model comparable with bankruptcy-resistant lending, debt collection, or compelled servicing systems. [14]
Price Manipulation ? Opaque, personalized, dynamic, urgency-based, algorithmic, hidden-fee, or market-power pricing that prevents customers from knowing the real price or exploits dependency, scarcity, or information asymmetry. Transparent posted pricing and genuinely public rate cards are not penalized here. Range: -5 to 0.	-3	Church of Scientology is penalized at -3 on Price Manipulation because church of Scientology's record in this pass does not show algorithmic or personalized price manipulation comparable with commercial platforms.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's record in this pass does not show algorithmic or personalized price manipulation comparable with commercial platforms. [15]
Unilateral Terms ? Non-negotiable clickthrough or adhesion terms that turn ordinary customer, user, subscriber, patient, tenant, or public-facing access into a one-sided contract, especially forced arbitration, class-action or mass-action waivers, unilateral modification, venue restrictions, broad indemnity, account termination discretion, or essential-service access conditioned on unreadable terms. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Church of Scientology is penalized at -5 on Unilateral Terms because church of Scientology's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually.. Church of Scientology is penalized at -5 on Unilateral Terms because church of Scientology's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually. [16]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Church of Scientology is penalized at -2 on Accountability Opacity because church of Scientology's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency.. Church of Scientology is penalized at -2 on Accountability Opacity because church of Scientology's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency. [17]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	Church of Scientology is penalized at -3 on Identity Capture because scientology identity capture is severe because doctrine, auditing, status progression, discipline, disconnection allegations, and group boundaries make exit and dissent costly.. Church of Scientology is penalized at -3 on Identity Capture because scientology identity capture is severe because doctrine, auditing, status progression, discipline, disconnection allegations, and group boundaries make exit and dissent costly.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Scientology identity capture is severe because doctrine, auditing, status progression, discipline, disconnection allegations, and group boundaries make exit and dissent costly. [18]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-3	Church of Scientology is penalized at -3 on Surveillance Capture because church of Scientology's current record in this pass does not show pervasive biometric, AI, or commercial surveillance systems comparable with surveillance-platform entries.. Church of Scientology is penalized at -3 on Surveillance Capture because church of Scientology's current record in this pass does not show pervasive biometric, AI, or commercial surveillance systems comparable with surveillance-platform entries.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology's current record in this pass does not show pervasive biometric, AI, or commercial surveillance systems comparable with surveillance-platform entries. [19]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	Church of Scientology is penalized at -3 on Ideological Disavowal because church of Scientology presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power.. Church of Scientology is penalized at -3 on Ideological Disavowal because church of Scientology presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Church of Scientology presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power. [20]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 91/100

20 verified linked claims 20 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 20/20 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 20/20

20 verified linked claims

Source quality 18/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

20 direct claims across 20 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 14, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

20/20 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Church of Scientology is governed as an institutional religious body rather than by worker, member-consumer, or affected-community ownership.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

2Scientology governance is centralized through church corporate structures, senior leadership, and discipline systems rather than democratic control by ordinary members or ex-members.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

3Church of Scientology's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people.

Extraction Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

4Church of Scientology's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with limited worker sovereignty compared with co-determined or worker-owned institutions.

Labor Sovereignty Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

5Church of Scientology's public record shows some ministry, charity, or mutual-aid orientation, but not a universal structural guarantee for people outside paid work.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

6Church of Scientology's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

7Church of Scientology is not an ordinary seller, but it controls access to religious community, services, identity, donations, or institutional recognition.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

8Scientology sells courses, auditing, training, and religious services, but product integrity is weak because advancement and belonging are bound to costly institutional dependency.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

9Church of Scientology's scale gives it public importance and service capacity, while also magnifying hierarchy, opacity, and identity pressure.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

10Church of Scientology's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.

Reversibility Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

11Litigation over Sea Org conditions and public controversy around coercive control make human harm material even where some claims have been litigated within religious-freedom defenses.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

12Church of Scientology's current record does not show direct institutional killing or armed coercion at the level of the historical violent religious-state cases in this pass.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

13Church of Scientology participates in public moral, legal, policy, or cultural advocacy where religious authority can shape civic rules affecting nonmembers.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

14Church of Scientology's record in this pass does not show a core debtor-control model comparable with bankruptcy-resistant lending, debt collection, or compelled servicing systems.

Debt Peonage Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

15Church of Scientology's record in this pass does not show algorithmic or personalized price manipulation comparable with commercial platforms.

Price Manipulation Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

16Church of Scientology's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually.

Unilateral Terms Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

17Church of Scientology's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

18Scientology identity capture is severe because doctrine, auditing, status progression, discipline, disconnection allegations, and group boundaries make exit and dissent costly.

Identity Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

19Church of Scientology's current record in this pass does not show pervasive biometric, AI, or commercial surveillance systems comparable with surveillance-platform entries.

Surveillance Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

20Church of Scientology presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power.

Ideological Disavowal Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Scientology official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Ninth Circuit Headley v. Church of Scientology InternationalPrimary public record · 100%
IRS Scientology closing agreement archivePrimary public record · 100%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD57 Catholic Worker Movement decentralized hospitality movement · same market AGOOD57 Mennonite Central Committee peace church relief organization · same market BQUALIFIED49 Aga Khan Development Network faith-linked development network · same market BQUALIFIED49 Tzu Chi Foundation Buddhist humanitarian foundation · same market BQUALIFIED47 Islamic Relief Worldwide faith-based humanitarian NGO · same market BQUALIFIED44 World Council of Churches ecumenical church fellowship · same market DEXTRACTIVE13 Al-Azhar Islamic university and authority · same market DEXTRACTIVE12 The Salvation Army religious charity · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Church of Scientology Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log