Code for America is a nonprofit civic-technology organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private benefit-navigation platforms. That places Code for America in the middle of Ownership: there is some mission, member, producer, or public-interest constraint, but decisive control is not fully democratic. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis.

Code for America is a nonprofit civic-technology organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private benefit-navigation platforms. That places Code for America in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis.

Code for America is a nonprofit civic-technology organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private benefit-navigation platforms. That places Code for America high on Extraction: surplus is structurally routed toward workers, producers, users, or public benefit instead of being primarily captured upward. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Code for America is a nonprofit civic-technology organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private benefit-navigation platforms. That places Code for America in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis.

Code for America is a nonprofit civic-technology organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private benefit-navigation platforms. That places Code for America high on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the institution materially supports people outside ordinary employment rather than treating exit as abandonment. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Code for America is a nonprofit civic-technology organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private benefit-navigation platforms. That places Code for America high on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: the institution is structured to absorb real costs rather than shifting losses onto weaker parties. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Code for America is a nonprofit civic-technology organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private benefit-navigation platforms. That places Code for America high on Market Conduct: pricing, access, switching, and bargaining practices show restraint compared with ordinary rent-seeking competitors. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Code for America builds tax and benefits-access services, supporting Product Integrity because it addresses recurring civic and financial needs. That places Code for America high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Code for America is a nonprofit civic-technology organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private benefit-navigation platforms. That places Code for America high on Scale Integrity: growth appears compatible with accountability, quality, and stakeholder benefit. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Code for America’s public-benefit tax and benefit tools support a Good Deal bonus because the service is designed around access rather than extraction. That supports partial Good Deal credit because ordinary users receive unusually fair value, durability, access, or surplus. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit.