CoopCycle describes its model as messenger-run and messenger-owned, with delivery cooperatives owned and managed by couriers, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment. That places CoopCycle high on Ownership: decisive control is held by workers, users, members, or another stakeholder class rather than outside capital. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

CoopCycle says each member has one vote and decisions are made collectively through online and physical assemblies, supporting strong democratic Governance. That places CoopCycle high on Governance: binding decisions are meaningfully answerable to people inside or affected by the institution. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

CoopCycle explicitly positions itself against gig-platform extraction, saying couriers should control their cooperative and work tools, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment. That places CoopCycle high on Extraction: surplus is structurally routed toward workers, producers, users, or public benefit instead of being primarily captured upward. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

CoopCycle explicitly positions itself against gig-platform extraction, saying couriers should control their cooperative and work tools, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment. That places CoopCycle high on Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have unusually strong formal power over work, conditions, or the institution itself. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

CoopCycle explicitly positions itself against gig-platform extraction, saying couriers should control their cooperative and work tools, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment. That places CoopCycle high on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the institution materially supports people outside ordinary employment rather than treating exit as abandonment. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

CoopCycle explicitly positions itself against gig-platform extraction, saying couriers should control their cooperative and work tools, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment. That places CoopCycle high on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: the institution is structured to absorb real costs rather than shifting losses onto weaker parties. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

CoopCycle explicitly positions itself against gig-platform extraction, saying couriers should control their cooperative and work tools, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment. That places CoopCycle high on Market Conduct: pricing, access, switching, and bargaining practices show restraint compared with ordinary rent-seeking competitors. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

CoopCycle provides a logistics and e-commerce platform for bicycle delivery cooperatives, including order management, route planning, courier management, invoicing, and storefront tools, supporting Product Integrity for local delivery and courier logistics. That places CoopCycle high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

CoopCycle frames bicycle delivery and cycle logistics as a way to decarbonize urban logistics, describes conduct considered under Ecological Harm in this pass. That places CoopCycle high on Scale Integrity: growth appears compatible with accountability, quality, and stakeholder benefit. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

CoopCycle uses a coopyleft reciprocity license that restricts platform use to cooperative or limited-profit projects, preventing capitalist appropriation of the delivery software and is relevant to Good Deal and Cost Transparency credit because shared infrastructure. That supports partial Good Deal credit because ordinary users receive unusually fair value, durability, access, or surplus. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit.

CoopCycle publicly describes its federation contribution as a first-year monthly fee followed by a percentage of delivery revenue, describes conduct considered under Cost Transparency. That supports partial Cost Transparency credit because pricing, margins, fees, funding, or surplus allocation are made meaningfully legible. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit.