public company

Levi Strauss & Co.

A public denim and apparel company selling jeans, clothing, and accessories through retail, wholesale, and online channels. Levi’s scores somewhat better than faster fashion peers because of supply-chain programs and durable core products, but remains a shareholder-governed global apparel company with labor and ecological burdens.

Why this matters: Jeans and basics are ordinary purchases, and Levi’s helps calibrate the middle ground between fast fashion and more durable apparel.

Letter grade D Extractive Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 11, 2026

Final Score 15* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE15 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material23

Bonus+1

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap24

Penalties-9

Private Government badge

Levi Strauss & Co. receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $1.8M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [9]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.

Strengths

Product Integrity4/5
Extraction3/10
Loss-Bearing Fidelity3/7

Penalties

Policy Capture-5
Ecological Harm-2
Toxic Products-1
Surveillance Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims9
Direct axis claims8
Coverage8/14

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance. Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance. That keeps Levi Strauss & Co. low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. That keeps Levi Strauss & Co. low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. [2] context Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance. [1] context Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control. [3] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens. [4] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk. [5] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users. [6] context Levi Strauss & Co. receives limited Good Deal credit because the service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits. [7]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. That keeps Levi Strauss & Co. low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. [2] context Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance. [1] context Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control. [3] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens. [4] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk. [5] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users. [6] context Levi Strauss & Co. receives limited Good Deal credit because the service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits. [7]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control. Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control. That keeps Levi Strauss & Co. low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. That keeps Levi Strauss & Co. low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. [2] context Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance. [1] context Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control. [3] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens. [4] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk. [5] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users. [6] context Levi Strauss & Co. receives limited Good Deal credit because the service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits. [7]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. That places Levi Strauss & Co. in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. [2] context Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance. [1] context Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control. [3] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens. [4] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk. [5] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users. [6] context Levi Strauss & Co. receives limited Good Deal credit because the service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits. [7]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. That places Levi Strauss & Co. in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. [2] context Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance. [1] context Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control. [3] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens. [4] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk. [5] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users. [6] context Levi Strauss & Co. receives limited Good Deal credit because the service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. That places Levi Strauss & Co. high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Linked evidence Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. [2]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. That places Levi Strauss & Co. in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels. [2] context Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance. [1] context Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control. [3] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens. [4] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk. [5] context Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users. [6] context Levi Strauss & Co. receives limited Good Deal credit because the service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits. [7]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-2	Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens. Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens. [4]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-5	OpenLobby records LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANY lobbying on trade, APP, tax with about $1.8M in spending across 34 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. OpenLobby records LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANY lobbying on trade, APP, tax with about $1.8M in spending across 34 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a limited Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANY lobbying on trade, APP, tax with about $1.8M in spending across 34 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [8]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk. Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk. That warrants a limited Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk. [5]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users. Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users. That warrants a limited Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users. [6]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	1 / 3	The service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits. The service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits. That supports partial Good Deal credit because ordinary users receive unusually fair value, durability, access, or surplus. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Linked evidence Levi Strauss & Co. receives limited Good Deal credit because the service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits. [7]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 74/100

8 verified linked claims 8 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 8/14 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 15/20

8 verified linked claims

Source quality 15/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

8 direct claims across 14 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

8/14 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Levi Strauss & Co. is controlled through conventional corporate ownership rather than worker, customer, or community governance.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Levi Strauss annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Levi Strauss supply-chain sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%
Levi Strauss privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%

2Levi Strauss & Co. sells apparel, footwear, accessories, or related consumer goods at large scale through stores, wholesale, and digital channels.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Levi Strauss annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Levi Strauss supply-chain sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%
Levi Strauss privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%

3Levi Strauss & Co. depends on global apparel or footwear supply chains where worker power is mostly mediated through supplier codes, audits, and compliance programs rather than worker control.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Levi Strauss annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Levi Strauss supply-chain sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%
Levi Strauss privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%

4Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Ecological Harm penalty: its clothing model creates material emissions, waste, packaging, production, logistics, or land-use burdens.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Levi Strauss annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Levi Strauss supply-chain sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%
Levi Strauss privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%

5Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Toxic Products penalty: its product category includes materials, chemicals, additives, packaging, or ordinary-use harms that create toxic or safety risk.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Levi Strauss annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Levi Strauss supply-chain sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%
Levi Strauss privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%

6Levi Strauss & Co. retains conduct relevant to the Surveillance Capture penalty: customer, app, account, location, purchase, trip, or behavioral data materially increases institutional power over users.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Levi Strauss annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Levi Strauss supply-chain sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%
Levi Strauss privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%

7Levi Strauss & Co. receives limited Good Deal credit because the service or products provide unusually broad practical usefulness or price value relative to adjacent competitors, despite the larger structural limits.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Levi Strauss annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Levi Strauss supply-chain sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%
Levi Strauss privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%

8OpenLobby records LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANY lobbying on trade, APP, tax with about $1.8M in spending across 34 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANY lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

9Levi Strauss & Co. receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $1.8M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANY lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

AGOOD58 Blue Tin Production worker-owned apparel manufacturing cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED46 Weinbrenner Shoe Company / Thorogood employee-owned footwear manufacturer · same market

Competitors

AGOOD58 Blue Tin Production worker-owned apparel manufacturing cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED46 Weinbrenner Shoe Company / Thorogood employee-owned footwear manufacturer · same market DEXTRACTIVE14 Fast Retailing / Uniqlo public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE11 lululemon public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE10 Adidas public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE7 Nike public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE1 Inditex / Zara public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE0 Gap Inc. public company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Levi Strauss & Co. Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log