public company

lululemon

A public athletic-apparel company selling yoga, running, training, lifestyle apparel, accessories, memberships, and digital/retail experiences. lululemon has stronger product durability than many apparel peers, but premium identity capture, synthetic-fiber footprint, customer-data collection, and shareholder governance keep it weak.

Why this matters: lululemon is a missing comparison for Nike, Adidas, Patagonia, REI, apparel retailers, and wellness-branded consumer companies.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 11, 2026

Final Score 11* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE11 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material23

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap23

Penalties-12

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Product Integrity4/5
Extraction3/10
Loss-Bearing Fidelity3/7

Penalties

Ecological Harm-4
Identity Capture-3
Surveillance Capture-2
Toxic Products-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims20
Direct axis claims20
Coverage15/15

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	lululemon is public and shareholder governed, with no binding worker, supplier, customer, or community control. lululemon is public and shareholder governed, with no binding worker, supplier, customer, or community control. That keeps lululemon low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence lululemon is public and shareholder governed, with no binding worker, supplier, customer, or community control. [1] lululemon is not governed by workers, customers, suppliers, or affected communities; formal control remains with shareholders, family owners, parent-company owners, creditors, or managers. [2]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	lululemon gives stakeholders ordinary market voice, employment voice, or customer-service channels, but not binding democratic control over major institutional decisions. lululemon gives stakeholders ordinary market voice, employment voice, or customer-service channels, but not binding democratic control over major institutional decisions. That keeps lululemon low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context lululemon is public and shareholder governed, with no binding worker, supplier, customer, or community control. [1] context lululemon sells athletic apparel, yoga and training clothing, accessories, memberships, digital services, and retail experiences. [3] lululemon gives stakeholders ordinary market voice, employment voice, or customer-service channels, but not binding democratic control over major institutional decisions. [4]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	lululemon sells useful goods while retaining a conventional retail structure in which surplus, pricing power, supplier pressure, and labor control are primarily managerial or investor-facing. lululemon sells useful goods while retaining a conventional retail structure in which surplus, pricing power, supplier pressure, and labor control are primarily managerial or investor-facing. That keeps lululemon low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context lululemon sells athletic apparel, yoga and training clothing, accessories, memberships, digital services, and retail experiences. [3] context lululemon is public and shareholder governed, with no binding worker, supplier, customer, or community control. [1] lululemon sells useful goods while retaining a conventional retail structure in which surplus, pricing power, supplier pressure, and labor control are primarily managerial or investor-facing. [5]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	lululemon workers remain in ordinary employer-managed retail jobs rather than worker-owned, codetermined, or union-secured control structures. lululemon workers remain in ordinary employer-managed retail jobs rather than worker-owned, codetermined, or union-secured control structures. That keeps lululemon low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context lululemon is public and shareholder governed, with no binding worker, supplier, customer, or community control. [1] lululemon workers remain in ordinary employer-managed retail jobs rather than worker-owned, codetermined, or union-secured control structures. [6]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	lululemon does not show unusual source-backed protection for workers who exit, people outside paid work, or customers with weak bargaining power beyond ordinary retail access. lululemon does not show unusual source-backed protection for workers who exit, people outside paid work, or customers with weak bargaining power beyond ordinary retail access. That keeps lululemon low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context lululemon sells athletic apparel, yoga and training clothing, accessories, memberships, digital services, and retail experiences. [3] lululemon does not show unusual source-backed protection for workers who exit, people outside paid work, or customers with weak bargaining power beyond ordinary retail access. [7]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	lululemon still shifts important costs from data collection, product churn, sourcing, packaging, pharmacy, fashion, or local-market power onto customers, workers, suppliers, or the public. lululemon still shifts important costs from data collection, product churn, sourcing, packaging, pharmacy, fashion, or local-market power onto customers, workers, suppliers, or the public. That places lululemon in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context lululemon sells athletic apparel, yoga and training clothing, accessories, memberships, digital services, and retail experiences. [3] context lululemon is public and shareholder governed, with no binding worker, supplier, customer, or community control. [1] context lululemon products often have stronger durability and function than low-end fast fashion, giving the company more product-integrity credit than disposable apparel peers. [8] context lululemon ties apparel to wellness identity, fitness culture, premium lifestyle, body presentation, community events, and brand belonging. [9] context lululemon’s synthetic apparel, global manufacturing, returns, packaging, and growth footprint create material climate, textile, and microfiber concerns. [10] lululemon still shifts important costs from data collection, product churn, sourcing, packaging, pharmacy, fashion, or local-market power onto customers, workers, suppliers, or the public. [11]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	lululemon shapes customer choice through scale, loyalty, credit, pharmacy, promotion, fashion, recommendation, or data systems rather than through simple transparent one-time transactions alone. lululemon shapes customer choice through scale, loyalty, credit, pharmacy, promotion, fashion, recommendation, or data systems rather than through simple transparent one-time transactions alone. That places lululemon in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence lululemon shapes customer choice through scale, loyalty, credit, pharmacy, promotion, fashion, recommendation, or data systems rather than through simple transparent one-time transactions alone. [12]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	lululemon sells athletic apparel, yoga and training clothing, accessories, memberships, digital services, and retail experiences. lululemon sells athletic apparel, yoga and training clothing, accessories, memberships, digital services, and retail experiences. That places lululemon high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Linked evidence lululemon sells athletic apparel, yoga and training clothing, accessories, memberships, digital services, and retail experiences. [3] lululemon products often have stronger durability and function than low-end fast fashion, giving the company more product-integrity credit than disposable apparel peers. [8] lululemon sells products or services with practical value, but product integrity is limited where quality is mixed with churn, exposure risk, identity marketing, or opaque sourcing. [13]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	lululemon uses scale to improve access and convenience while also concentrating purchasing power, customer data, supplier leverage, and environmental burden. lululemon uses scale to improve access and convenience while also concentrating purchasing power, customer data, supplier leverage, and environmental burden. That places lululemon in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context lululemon sells athletic apparel, yoga and training clothing, accessories, memberships, digital services, and retail experiences. [3] context lululemon is public and shareholder governed, with no binding worker, supplier, customer, or community control. [1] context lululemon’s synthetic apparel, global manufacturing, returns, packaging, and growth footprint create material climate, textile, and microfiber concerns. [10] lululemon uses scale to improve access and convenience while also concentrating purchasing power, customer data, supplier leverage, and environmental burden. [14]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-4	lululemon’s synthetic apparel, global manufacturing, returns, packaging, and growth footprint create material climate, textile, and microfiber concerns. lululemon’s synthetic apparel, global manufacturing, returns, packaging, and growth footprint create material climate, textile, and microfiber concerns. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence lululemon’s synthetic apparel, global manufacturing, returns, packaging, and growth footprint create material climate, textile, and microfiber concerns. [10] lululemon depends on retail operations, packaging, logistics, refrigeration, apparel, beauty, fuel, pharmacy, or product churn with material environmental costs. [15]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	lululemon sells product categories such as pharmacy goods, supplements, cosmetics, fragrance, candles, cheap plastics, candy, or personal-care products where exposure or safety risk is material. lululemon sells product categories such as pharmacy goods, supplements, cosmetics, fragrance, candles, cheap plastics, candy, or personal-care products where exposure or safety risk is material. That warrants a limited Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence lululemon sells product categories such as pharmacy goods, supplements, cosmetics, fragrance, candles, cheap plastics, candy, or personal-care products where exposure or safety risk is material. [16]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	lululemon materially reaches young people through toys, candy, beauty, sports, trend goods, youth culture, school/team identity, or teen-oriented retail environments. lululemon materially reaches young people through toys, candy, beauty, sports, trend goods, youth culture, school/team identity, or teen-oriented retail environments. That warrants a limited Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence lululemon materially reaches young people through toys, candy, beauty, sports, trend goods, youth culture, school/team identity, or teen-oriented retail environments. [17]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	lululemon ties apparel to wellness identity, fitness culture, premium lifestyle, body presentation, community events, and brand belonging. lululemon ties apparel to wellness identity, fitness culture, premium lifestyle, body presentation, community events, and brand belonging. That warrants a severe Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence lululemon ties apparel to wellness identity, fitness culture, premium lifestyle, body presentation, community events, and brand belonging. [9] lululemon turns consumption into beauty, fashion, wellness, status, fandom, sport, youth, scent, or lifestyle identity rather than simple product access. [18]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	lululemon privacy materials show collection through stores, apps, websites, accounts, loyalty, pharmacy, advertising, device, preference, or transaction data channels. lululemon privacy materials show collection through stores, apps, websites, accounts, loyalty, pharmacy, advertising, device, preference, or transaction data channels. That warrants a substantial Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence lululemon privacy materials show collection through stores, apps, websites, accounts, loyalty, pharmacy, advertising, device, preference, or transaction data channels. [19]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	lululemon presents retail access as neutral consumer choice while underplaying institutional choices embedded in data collection, loyalty design, sourcing, identity marketing, supplier power, and pricing architecture. lululemon presents retail access as neutral consumer choice while underplaying institutional choices embedded in data collection, loyalty design, sourcing, identity marketing, supplier power, and pricing architecture. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence context lululemon ties apparel to wellness identity, fitness culture, premium lifestyle, body presentation, community events, and brand belonging. [9] lululemon presents retail access as neutral consumer choice while underplaying institutional choices embedded in data collection, loyalty design, sourcing, identity marketing, supplier power, and pricing architecture. [20]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 82/100

20 verified linked claims 20 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

20 verified linked claims

Source quality 16/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

20 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

15/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1lululemon is public and shareholder governed, with no binding worker, supplier, customer, or community control.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

2lululemon is not governed by workers, customers, suppliers, or affected communities; formal control remains with shareholders, family owners, parent-company owners, creditors, or managers.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

3lululemon sells athletic apparel, yoga and training clothing, accessories, memberships, digital services, and retail experiences.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

4lululemon gives stakeholders ordinary market voice, employment voice, or customer-service channels, but not binding democratic control over major institutional decisions.

Governance Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

5lululemon sells useful goods while retaining a conventional retail structure in which surplus, pricing power, supplier pressure, and labor control are primarily managerial or investor-facing.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

6lululemon workers remain in ordinary employer-managed retail jobs rather than worker-owned, codetermined, or union-secured control structures.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

7lululemon does not show unusual source-backed protection for workers who exit, people outside paid work, or customers with weak bargaining power beyond ordinary retail access.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

8lululemon products often have stronger durability and function than low-end fast fashion, giving the company more product-integrity credit than disposable apparel peers.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

9lululemon ties apparel to wellness identity, fitness culture, premium lifestyle, body presentation, community events, and brand belonging.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

10lululemon’s synthetic apparel, global manufacturing, returns, packaging, and growth footprint create material climate, textile, and microfiber concerns.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

11lululemon still shifts important costs from data collection, product churn, sourcing, packaging, pharmacy, fashion, or local-market power onto customers, workers, suppliers, or the public.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

12lululemon shapes customer choice through scale, loyalty, credit, pharmacy, promotion, fashion, recommendation, or data systems rather than through simple transparent one-time transactions alone.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

13lululemon sells products or services with practical value, but product integrity is limited where quality is mixed with churn, exposure risk, identity marketing, or opaque sourcing.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

14lululemon uses scale to improve access and convenience while also concentrating purchasing power, customer data, supplier leverage, and environmental burden.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

15lululemon depends on retail operations, packaging, logistics, refrigeration, apparel, beauty, fuel, pharmacy, or product churn with material environmental costs.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

16lululemon sells product categories such as pharmacy goods, supplements, cosmetics, fragrance, candles, cheap plastics, candy, or personal-care products where exposure or safety risk is material.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

17lululemon materially reaches young people through toys, candy, beauty, sports, trend goods, youth culture, school/team identity, or teen-oriented retail environments.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

18lululemon turns consumption into beauty, fashion, wellness, status, fandom, sport, youth, scent, or lifestyle identity rather than simple product access.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

19lululemon privacy materials show collection through stores, apps, websites, accounts, loyalty, pharmacy, advertising, device, preference, or transaction data channels.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

20lululemon presents retail access as neutral consumer choice while underplaying institutional choices embedded in data collection, loyalty design, sourcing, identity marketing, supplier power, and pricing architecture.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

lululemon privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
lululemon annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
lululemon impact reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

Alternatives

AGOOD58 Blue Tin Production worker-owned apparel manufacturing cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED46 Weinbrenner Shoe Company / Thorogood employee-owned footwear manufacturer · same market

Competitors

AGOOD58 Blue Tin Production worker-owned apparel manufacturing cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED46 Weinbrenner Shoe Company / Thorogood employee-owned footwear manufacturer · same market DEXTRACTIVE15 Levi Strauss & Co. public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE14 Fast Retailing / Uniqlo public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE10 Adidas public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE7 Nike public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE1 Inditex / Zara public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE0 Gap Inc. public company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for lululemon Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log