public company

Nintendo

A public video-game hardware, software, and IP company with strong product craft, shareholder control, closed-platform lock-in, and aggressive enforcement against emulation, modding, and fan uses. Nintendo remains weak because of identity capture, ideological disavowal, and youth capture, even where the product or service has practical value.

Why this matters: Nintendo shows how high product craft can coexist with restrictive ecosystem control and escalating IP enforcement against users and adjacent creators.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score 18* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE18 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material21

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap21

Penalties-3

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Youth Capture.

Strengths

Product Integrity4/5
Extraction3/10
Labor Sovereignty3/7

Penalties

Youth Capture-1
Identity Capture-1
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims14
Direct axis claims14
Coverage12/12

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. That keeps Nintendo low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 12 scored entries below, 65 tied, 149 above on Ownership. Linked evidence Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. [1] context Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. [2] context Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. [3] Nintendo publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [4]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. That keeps Nintendo low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 68 tied, 156 above on Governance. Linked evidence context Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. [1] context Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. [2] context Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. [3] Nintendo's annual report describes a public entertainment company governed through corporate and shareholder channels, with consumers, workers, and supply-chain participants outside formal democratic control. [5]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. That keeps Nintendo low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 39 scored entries below, 22 tied, 165 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. [1] context Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. [2] context Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. [3] context Nintendo has repeatedly used criminal referrals, civil copyright and anti-circumvention litigation, permanent injunctions, damages settlements, and takedown demands against Switch hacking devices, emulators, modding tools, and Nintendo-related user-created content. [6] Nintendo reports that its main business is developing, manufacturing, and selling dedicated video-game hardware and related software, a useful but proprietary hardware-software platform model that captures surplus through controlled ecosystems. [7]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. That places Nintendo in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 45 scored entries below, 66 tied, 115 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. [1] context Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. [2] Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	3 / 7	Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. That places Nintendo in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 81 scored entries below, 45 tied, 100 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. [1] context Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. [2] context Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. [3] Nintendo's CSR materials emphasize consumers, employees, suppliers, shareholders, investors, and the environment, but they do not show strong protections for people excluded by price, platform control, or employment status. [8]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. That places Nintendo in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 48 scored entries below, 39 tied, 139 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. [1] context Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. [2] context Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. [3] Nintendo reports product quality, consumer support, supplier communication, and environmental initiatives, showing some loss-bearing responsibility while leaving ordinary supply-chain and platform-control limits in place. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. That keeps Nintendo low on Market Conduct: market power, lock-in, coercive pricing, or exclusionary conduct is a major part of the institution's position. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 15 scored entries below, 15 tied, 196 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. [1] Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. [2] context Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. [3] Nintendo has repeatedly used criminal referrals, civil copyright and anti-circumvention litigation, permanent injunctions, damages settlements, and takedown demands against Switch hacking devices, emulators, modding tools, and Nintendo-related user-created content. [6]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Nintendo publishes corporate social responsibility and product-safety materials for its entertainment products. Nintendo publishes corporate social responsibility and product-safety materials for its entertainment products. That places Nintendo high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 61 scored entries below, 72 tied, 93 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. [1] context Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. [2] context Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. [3] Nintendo publishes corporate social responsibility and product-safety materials for its entertainment products. [10] context Nintendo has repeatedly used criminal referrals, civil copyright and anti-circumvention litigation, permanent injunctions, damages settlements, and takedown demands against Switch hacking devices, emulators, modding tools, and Nintendo-related user-created content. [6]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. That places Nintendo in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 18 tied, 177 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. [1] context Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred. [2] context Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner. [3] context Nintendo has repeatedly used criminal referrals, civil copyright and anti-circumvention litigation, permanent injunctions, damages settlements, and takedown demands against Switch hacking devices, emulators, modding tools, and Nintendo-related user-created content. [6] Nintendo's integrated hardware-software entertainment model scales across platform generations, creating durable cultural and consumer value while also preserving proprietary lock-in. [11]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	A proposed class complaint alleged that Mario Kart Tour’s former loot-box-like gacha mechanic encouraged addictive gambling-like behavior among minors; Nintendo had removed the gacha pipe system before the suit. A proposed class complaint alleged that Mario Kart Tour’s former loot-box-like gacha mechanic encouraged addictive gambling-like behavior among minors; Nintendo had removed the gacha pipe system before the suit. That warrants a limited Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 13 scored entries below, 1 tied, 212 above on Youth Capture. Linked evidence A proposed class complaint alleged that Mario Kart Tour’s former loot-box-like gacha mechanic encouraged addictive gambling-like behavior among minors; Nintendo had removed the gacha pipe system before the suit. [13]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Nintendo account and eShop terms create customer identity/account pressure because purchases, balances, and transfer limits are tied to account structures. Nintendo account and eShop terms create customer identity/account pressure because purchases, balances, and transfer limits are tied to account structures. That warrants a limited Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 24 scored entries below, 6 tied, 196 above on Identity Capture. Linked evidence Nintendo account and eShop terms create customer identity/account pressure because purchases, balances, and transfer limits are tied to account structures. [12]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Nintendo's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Nintendo shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise,… Nintendo's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Nintendo shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Nintendo's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Nintendo shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [14]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 81/100

14 verified linked claims 14 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 12/12 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 15/20

14 verified linked claims

Source quality 14/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

14 direct claims across 12 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

12/12 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Nintendo annual reporting describes ordinary shareholder governance, shareholder equity, dividends, and board resolutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Nintendo Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Nintendo FY2025 financial resultsGeneral web source · 58%

2Nintendo support materials state that downloaded purchases are managed by account, balances cannot be merged across accounts, and purchased downloaded goods generally cannot be returned, refunded, or transferred.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Nintendo eShop usage notesGeneral web source · 58%

3Nintendo reports supply-chain CSR verification and says it did not identify serious FY2025 issues that would require ceasing business with a production partner.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Nintendo CSR supply chain reportGeneral web source · 58%

4Nintendo publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

Nintendo investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

5Nintendo's annual report describes a public entertainment company governed through corporate and shareholder channels, with consumers, workers, and supply-chain participants outside formal democratic control.

Governance Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Nintendo Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%

6Nintendo has repeatedly used criminal referrals, civil copyright and anti-circumvention litigation, permanent injunctions, damages settlements, and takedown demands against Switch hacking devices, emulators, modding tools, and Nintendo-related user-created content.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

U.S. DOJ: Team Xecuter public voice sentenced and restitution to NintendoPrimary public record · 100%
Justia docket: Nintendo of America Inc. v. Tropic Haze LLC final judgment and permanent injunctionGeneral web source · 58%
Ars Technica: Garry’s Mod taking down Nintendo-related Steam Workshop contentGeneral web source · 58%
CourtListener PDF: Nintendo of America Inc. v. Daly stipulated judgment and permanent injunctionPrimary public record · 100%

7Nintendo reports that its main business is developing, manufacturing, and selling dedicated video-game hardware and related software, a useful but proprietary hardware-software platform model that captures surplus through controlled ecosystems.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Nintendo Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%

8Nintendo's CSR materials emphasize consumers, employees, suppliers, shareholders, investors, and the environment, but they do not show strong protections for people excluded by price, platform control, or employment status.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Nintendo CSR informationGeneral web source · 58%

9Nintendo reports product quality, consumer support, supplier communication, and environmental initiatives, showing some loss-bearing responsibility while leaving ordinary supply-chain and platform-control limits in place.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Nintendo CSR informationGeneral web source · 58%

10Nintendo publishes corporate social responsibility and product-safety materials for its entertainment products.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

Nintendo CSR informationGeneral web source · 58%

11Nintendo's integrated hardware-software entertainment model scales across platform generations, creating durable cultural and consumer value while also preserving proprietary lock-in.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Nintendo Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%

12Nintendo account and eShop terms create customer identity/account pressure because purchases, balances, and transfer limits are tied to account structures.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Nintendo eShop usage notesGeneral web source · 58%

13A proposed class complaint alleged that Mario Kart Tour’s former loot-box-like gacha mechanic encouraged addictive gambling-like behavior among minors; Nintendo had removed the gacha pipe system before the suit.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

N.A. v. Nintendo of America complaintPrimary public record · 100%
Nintendo World Report: Mario Kart Tour removing gacha mechanicsGeneral web source · 58%

14Nintendo's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Nintendo shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Nintendo official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Nintendo CSR informationGeneral web source · 58%
Nintendo Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%

Alternatives

AGOOD63 Future Club employee-owned cooperative game studio · United States AGOOD63 KO_OP worker-owned game studio · Canada AGOOD63 Motion Twin worker cooperative game studio · France AGOOD61 Means Interactive cooperative game publisher · United States AGOOD58 Blender Foundation public-benefit open-source foundation · Netherlands

Competitors

DEXTRACTIVE24 SEGA video-game and entertainment company · same market DEXTRACTIVE24 Square Enix public video-game publisher · same market AGOOD63 Future Club employee-owned cooperative game studio · United States AGOOD63 KO_OP worker-owned game studio · Canada AGOOD63 Motion Twin worker cooperative game studio · France AGOOD61 Means Interactive cooperative game publisher · United States AGOOD58 Blender Foundation public-benefit open-source foundation · Netherlands AGOOD56 Stocksy United artist cooperative platform · United States

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Nintendo Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding youth-capture-assessment

Added source-backed Youth Capture penalty -1 based on evidence specific to youth data, child-directed marketing, loot-box/gambling-like monetization, or youth-culture manipulation.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty 0 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding confidence-calibration

Rechecked evidence coverage and source quality during the evaluation-quality pass; confidence now reflects direct source coverage, complexity, and remaining uncertainty rather than score direction.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai_scaffolding score

Added sourced IP-enforcement-pattern claim and recalibrated Nintendo extraction, market conduct, product integrity, and scale integrity components; tentative score decreased to reflect litigation, takedown, emulator, and modding-control evidence.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai_scaffolding score

Published tentative AI-generated scaffolding score 29 for initial human review under gcd-rubric-v1.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding initial-evaluation-quality-pass

Added sourced claims and revised tentative AI score components during the initial evaluation completion pass.

View Full Audit Log