government / limited self-government authority

Palestinian Authority

A limited self-government authority in parts of the occupied West Bank, with constrained sovereignty and documented accountability problems including arbitrary detention, torture allegations, and restrictions on expression and assembly. Palestinian Authority scores low because of coercive violence, documented human harm, and person-dependent governance, with extractive economics and centralized governance reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: The Palestinian Authority should not be collapsed into either Hamas or the Palestinian people; its limited authority and documented abuses deserve separate calibration.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score -19* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-19 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material12

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap12

Penalties-31

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Coercive Violence.

Strengths

Ownership2/10
Labor Sovereignty2/7
Product Integrity2/5

Penalties

Coercive Violence-10
Human Harm-8
Reversibility-5
Accountability Opacity-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims9
Direct axis claims9
Coverage9/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. That keeps Palestinian Authority low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 78 scored entries below, 21 tied, 127 above on Ownership. Linked evidence context Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. [1] context The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. [2]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. That keeps Palestinian Authority low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 68 tied, 156 above on Governance. Uncertainty Priority page: add more axis-specific research over time to make the comparative placement harder to dispute. Linked evidence Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. [1] context The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	1 / 10	Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. That keeps Palestinian Authority low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 17 tied, 207 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. [1] context The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. [2]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. That keeps Palestinian Authority low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 8 scored entries below, 36 tied, 182 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. [1] context The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. [2]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. That keeps Palestinian Authority low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 3 scored entries below, 27 tied, 196 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. [1] context The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. [2]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	1 / 7	The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. That keeps Palestinian Authority low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 12 scored entries below, 20 tied, 194 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Uncertainty Priority page: add more axis-specific research over time to make the comparative placement harder to dispute. Linked evidence context Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. [1] The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. [2]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. That keeps Palestinian Authority low on Market Conduct: market power, lock-in, coercive pricing, or exclusionary conduct is a major part of the institution's position. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 15 scored entries below, 15 tied, 196 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. [1] context The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. [2]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	2 / 5	Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. That places Palestinian Authority in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 23 scored entries below, 13 tied, 190 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. [1] context The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. [2]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	1 / 5	Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. That keeps Palestinian Authority low on Scale Integrity: scale magnifies harm, gatekeeping, opacity, or extraction rather than disciplining it. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 14 scored entries below, 16 tied, 196 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures. [1] context The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity. [2]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Positive conduct by the Palestinian Authority is not structurally locked by current democratic accountability and is further destabilized by occupation and factional pressures. Positive conduct by the Palestinian Authority is not structurally locked by current democratic accountability and is further destabilized by occupation and factional pressures. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence Positive conduct by the Palestinian Authority is not structurally locked by current democratic accountability and is further destabilized by occupation and factional pressures. [3]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-8	Human Rights Watch reports abuses by Palestinian authorities including arbitrary arrests, torture or ill-treatment allegations, and restrictions on expression and assembly. Human Rights Watch reports abuses by Palestinian authorities including arbitrary arrests, torture or ill-treatment allegations, and restrictions on expression and assembly. That warrants a substantial Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 33 scored entries below, 4 tied, 189 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence Human Rights Watch reports abuses by Palestinian authorities including arbitrary arrests, torture or ill-treatment allegations, and restrictions on expression and assembly. [4]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-10	Human Rights Watch and Freedom House reporting on Palestinian Authority arbitrary arrests, torture or ill-treatment allegations, and security-service control describes conduct considered under Coercive Violence. Human Rights Watch and Freedom House reporting on Palestinian Authority arbitrary arrests, torture or ill-treatment allegations, and security-service control describes conduct considered under Coercive Violence. That warrants a limited Coercive Violence penalty because the institution uses, enables, profits from, or materially supports violent domination, detention abuse, war, or armed coercion. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 8 scored entries below, 1 tied, 217 above on Coercive Violence. Linked evidence Human Rights Watch and Freedom House reporting on Palestinian Authority arbitrary arrests, torture or ill-treatment allegations, and security-service control describes conduct considered under Coercive Violence. [5]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	The Palestinian Authority’s constrained and delayed democratic accountability, security-service practices, and limited institutional transparency create material public-accountability opacity. The Palestinian Authority’s constrained and delayed democratic accountability, security-service practices, and limited institutional transparency create material public-accountability opacity. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence The Palestinian Authority’s constrained and delayed democratic accountability, security-service practices, and limited institutional transparency create material public-accountability opacity. [6]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Palestinian Authority governance is embedded in national liberation, factional, and security pressures that can suppress dissent and political alternatives. Palestinian Authority governance is embedded in national liberation, factional, and security pressures that can suppress dissent and political alternatives. That warrants a substantial Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 13 scored entries below, 10 tied, 203 above on Identity Capture. Linked evidence Palestinian Authority governance is embedded in national liberation, factional, and security pressures that can suppress dissent and political alternatives. [7]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Freedom House reports limits on political rights and civil liberties in the West Bank, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture PA security-service and coercive governance practices. Freedom House reports limits on political rights and civil liberties in the West Bank, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture PA security-service and coercive governance practices. That warrants a substantial Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 30 scored entries below, 4 tied, 192 above on Surveillance Capture. Linked evidence Freedom House reports limits on political rights and civil liberties in the West Bank, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture PA security-service and coercive governance practices. [8]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Palestinian Authority's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Palestinian Authority exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly… Palestinian Authority's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Palestinian Authority exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service. That warrants a substantial Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Palestinian Authority's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Palestinian Authority exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service. [9]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 71/100

9 verified linked claims 9 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 9/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

9 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

9 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

9/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Freedom House reports that the West Bank has limited political rights and civil liberties, with Palestinian Authority governance constrained by Israeli occupation and by PA accountability failures.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

2The Palestinian Authority operates under sharply limited sovereignty and external constraints, so some governance failures occur in a context of occupation rather than full state capacity.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

3Positive conduct by the Palestinian Authority is not structurally locked by current democratic accountability and is further destabilized by occupation and factional pressures.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

4Human Rights Watch reports abuses by Palestinian authorities including arbitrary arrests, torture or ill-treatment allegations, and restrictions on expression and assembly.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Human Rights Watch: Israel and PalestineGeneral web source · 58%

5Human Rights Watch and Freedom House reporting on Palestinian Authority arbitrary arrests, torture or ill-treatment allegations, and security-service control describes conduct considered under Coercive Violence.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Human Rights Watch: Israel and PalestineGeneral web source · 58%
Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

6The Palestinian Authority’s constrained and delayed democratic accountability, security-service practices, and limited institutional transparency create material public-accountability opacity.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

7Palestinian Authority governance is embedded in national liberation, factional, and security pressures that can suppress dissent and political alternatives.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

8Freedom House reports limits on political rights and civil liberties in the West Bank, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture PA security-service and coercive governance practices.

Surveillance Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

9Palestinian Authority's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Palestinian Authority exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Palestinian Authority official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Israel and PalestineGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

AGOOD51 Republic of Finland government · Finland

Competitors

FMALIGNANT-52 State of Israel government government · same market FMALIGNANT-60 Hamas armed group / de facto authority · same market FMALIGNANT-70 Israel Defense Forces military · same market AGOOD51 Republic of Finland government · Finland CPERFORMATIVE37 Kingdom of Norway government · Norway DEXTRACTIVE27 Federal Student Aid U.S. Department of Education student-aid office · United States DEXTRACTIVE23 United Nations intergovernmental organization · Global FMALIGNANT-17 United States federal government government · United States

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Palestinian Authority Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding

View Full Audit Log