government

State of Israel government

A state with democratic institutions for many citizens but also entrenched occupation, unequal rights across controlled populations, severe Gaza-war harms, and intensive security and surveillance systems. State of Israel government scores low because of coercive violence, documented human harm, and ecological harm, with poor loss-bearing fidelity reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: Israel tests the rubric’s ability to separate partial internal democracy from state power exercised over people without equal political control.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score -52* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-52 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material19

Bonus+2

Cap41Ownership <= 4 and Governance <= 4

After Cap21

Penalties-73

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Coercive Violence.

Strengths

Ownership4/10
Governance4/10
Labor Sovereignty3/7

Penalties

Coercive Violence-28
Human Harm-20
Ecological Harm-7
Reversibility-5

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims11
Direct axis claims11
Coverage11/19

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	4 / 10	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. That places State of Israel government in the middle of Ownership: there is some mission, member, producer, or public-interest constraint, but decisive control is not fully democratic. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 110 scored entries below, 7 tied, 109 above on Ownership. Linked evidence context Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	4 / 10	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. That places State of Israel government in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 108 scored entries below, 18 tied, 100 above on Governance. Uncertainty Priority page: add more axis-specific research over time to make the comparative placement harder to dispute. Linked evidence Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. That keeps State of Israel government low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 20 scored entries below, 18 tied, 188 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. That places State of Israel government in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 45 scored entries below, 66 tied, 115 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. That keeps State of Israel government low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 3 scored entries below, 27 tied, 196 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	1 / 7	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. That keeps State of Israel government low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 12 scored entries below, 20 tied, 194 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. That keeps State of Israel government low on Market Conduct: market power, lock-in, coercive pricing, or exclusionary conduct is a major part of the institution's position. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 15 scored entries below, 15 tied, 196 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	2 / 5	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. That places State of Israel government in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 23 scored entries below, 13 tied, 190 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	1 / 5	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. That keeps State of Israel government low on Scale Integrity: scale magnifies harm, gatekeeping, opacity, or extraction rather than disciplining it. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 14 scored entries below, 16 tied, 196 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Israel’s positive governance features depend on contested courts, elections, coalition politics, and security-policy choices rather than equal control by all people subject to its power. Israel’s positive governance features depend on contested courts, elections, coalition politics, and security-policy choices rather than equal control by all people subject to its power. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence Israel’s positive governance features depend on contested courts, elections, coalition politics, and security-policy choices rather than equal control by all people subject to its power. [4]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-20	Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International report severe Israeli government and military abuses in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territory, including alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International report severe Israeli government and military abuses in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territory, including alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. That warrants a severe Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 9 tied, 217 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International report severe Israeli government and military abuses in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territory, including alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. [5]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-28	Israeli state responsibility for Gaza war conduct, occupation, movement control, and security systems creates near-maximum coercive-violence exposure. Israeli state responsibility for Gaza war conduct, occupation, movement control, and security systems creates near-maximum coercive-violence exposure. That warrants a severe Coercive Violence penalty because the institution uses, enables, profits from, or materially supports violent domination, detention abuse, war, or armed coercion. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 3 scored entries below, 0 tied, 223 above on Coercive Violence. Linked evidence Israeli state responsibility for Gaza war conduct, occupation, movement control, and security systems creates near-maximum coercive-violence exposure. [6]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-7	The State of Israel gets a material Ecological Harm penalty because Gaza-war and occupation-related destruction create serious infrastructure, rubble, waste, and pollution harms beyond an ordinary national footprint. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 21 scored entries below, 11 tied, 194 above on Ecological Harm. Linked evidence The Gaza war and occupation-related destruction create material ecological and infrastructure harms alongside Israel’s ordinary national footprint. [7]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Military, intelligence, occupation, and wartime decision-making create material opacity and accountability barriers despite formal democratic institutions. Military, intelligence, occupation, and wartime decision-making create material opacity and accountability barriers despite formal democratic institutions. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence Military, intelligence, occupation, and wartime decision-making create material opacity and accountability barriers despite formal democratic institutions. [8]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	Israel’s state structure and conflict governance create strong national, ethnic, religious, and security identity pressures, especially across populations under unequal control. Israel’s state structure and conflict governance create strong national, ethnic, religious, and security identity pressures, especially across populations under unequal control. That warrants a severe Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 12 tied, 214 above on Identity Capture. Linked evidence Israel’s state structure and conflict governance create strong national, ethnic, religious, and security identity pressures, especially across populations under unequal control. [9]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Israel’s control over Palestinians includes extensive security, border, movement, and surveillance systems, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture. Israel’s control over Palestinians includes extensive security, border, movement, and surveillance systems, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture. That warrants a severe Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 12 tied, 214 above on Surveillance Capture. Linked evidence Israel’s control over Palestinians includes extensive security, border, movement, and surveillance systems, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture. [10]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	State of Israel government's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because State of Israel government combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power… State of Israel government's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because State of Israel government combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced claims of neutrality, administrative necessity, national legitimacy, safety, objectivity, or professional expertise. That warrants a severe Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence State of Israel government's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because State of Israel government combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced claims of neutrality, administrative necessity, national legitimacy, safety, objectivity, or professional expertise. [11]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	1 / 3	Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity, is relevant to only limited dissent-protection credit because people under occupation do not receive equal political protections. Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity, is relevant to only limited dissent-protection credit because people under occupation do not receive equal political protections. That supports partial Openness to Dissent credit because people can criticize, dissent, or challenge the institution without being managed into silence. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 188 scored entries below, 11 tied, 27 above on Openness to Dissent. Linked evidence context Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence. [1] Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity, is relevant to only limited dissent-protection credit because people under occupation do not receive equal political protections. [2]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	1 / 3	Israel has real electoral and judicial institutions for many citizens, is relevant to only limited constitutional-spirit credit because millions under its control lack equal political rights. Israel has real electoral and judicial institutions for many citizens, is relevant to only limited constitutional-spirit credit because millions under its control lack equal political rights. That supports partial Constitutional Spirit credit because the institution respects speech, privacy, due process, conscience, or civil-liberties norms beyond bare legal compulsion. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 182 scored entries below, 5 tied, 39 above on Constitutional Spirit. Linked evidence Israel has real electoral and judicial institutions for many citizens, is relevant to only limited constitutional-spirit credit because millions under its control lack equal political rights. [3]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 71/100

11 verified linked claims 11 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 11/19 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

11 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

11 direct claims across 19 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

11/19 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity but separately reports severe rights deficits in the West Bank and Gaza under Israeli control or influence.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: Israel, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%
Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%
Freedom House: Gaza Strip, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

2Freedom House rates Israel free inside its recognized polity, is relevant to only limited dissent-protection credit because people under occupation do not receive equal political protections.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: Israel, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%
Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

3Israel has real electoral and judicial institutions for many citizens, is relevant to only limited constitutional-spirit credit because millions under its control lack equal political rights.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: Israel, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%
Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

4Israel’s positive governance features depend on contested courts, elections, coalition politics, and security-policy choices rather than equal control by all people subject to its power.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Freedom House: Israel, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%
Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

5Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International report severe Israeli government and military abuses in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territory, including alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Human Rights Watch: Israel and PalestineGeneral web source · 58%
Amnesty International: Israel and Occupied Palestinian Territories reportGeneral web source · 58%

6Israeli state responsibility for Gaza war conduct, occupation, movement control, and security systems creates near-maximum coercive-violence exposure.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Human Rights Watch: Israel and PalestineGeneral web source · 58%
Amnesty International: Israel and Occupied Palestinian Territories reportGeneral web source · 58%
Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

7The Gaza war and occupation-related destruction create material ecological and infrastructure harms alongside Israel’s ordinary national footprint.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

UNEP: Environmental impact of the conflict in GazaGeneral web source · 58%

8Military, intelligence, occupation, and wartime decision-making create material opacity and accountability barriers despite formal democratic institutions.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Human Rights Watch: Israel and PalestineGeneral web source · 58%

9Israel’s state structure and conflict governance create strong national, ethnic, religious, and security identity pressures, especially across populations under unequal control.

Identity Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Human Rights Watch: Israel and PalestineGeneral web source · 58%

10Israel’s control over Palestinians includes extensive security, border, movement, and surveillance systems, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture.

Surveillance Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Human Rights Watch: Israel and PalestineGeneral web source · 58%
Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

11State of Israel government's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because State of Israel government combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced claims of neutrality, administrative necessity, national legitimacy, safety, objectivity, or professional expertise.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

State of Israel government official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Freedom House: Israel, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%
Freedom House: West Bank, Freedom in the World 2025General web source · 58%

Alternatives

AGOOD51 Republic of Finland government · Finland

Competitors

FMALIGNANT-19 Palestinian Authority government / limited self-government authority · same market FMALIGNANT-60 Hamas armed group / de facto authority · same market FMALIGNANT-70 Israel Defense Forces military · same market AGOOD51 Republic of Finland government · Finland CPERFORMATIVE37 Kingdom of Norway government · Norway DEXTRACTIVE27 Federal Student Aid U.S. Department of Education student-aid office · United States DEXTRACTIVE23 United Nations intergovernmental organization · Global FMALIGNANT-17 United States federal government government · United States

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for State of Israel government Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding

View Full Audit Log