academic, education, and professional publisher

Wiley

A public academic, education, and professional publishing company serving research, learning, and professional markets. Its knowledge products matter, but access barriers and academic-market extraction make it a poor steward of public research compared with open alternatives.

Why this matters: Wiley’s knowledge products matter, but academic publishing economics, subscription/access barriers, and public-company extraction keep it low.

Letter grade D Extractive Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 8, 2026

Final Score 18* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE18 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material24

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap24

Penalties-6

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Accountability Opacity.

Strengths

Product Integrity4/5
Extraction3/10
Labor Sovereignty3/7

Penalties

Accountability Opacity-2
Ideological Disavowal-2
Ecological Harm-1
Identity Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims7
Direct axis claims6
Coverage6/13

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. [1] context Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. [2] context Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. [1] context Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. [2] context Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. That keeps Wiley low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. [1] context Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. [2] context Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. That places Wiley in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. [1] context Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. [2] context Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	2 / 7	Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. That keeps Wiley low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. [1] context Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. [2] context Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. That places Wiley in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. [1] context Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. [2] context Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. That places Wiley in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. [1] context Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. [2] context Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. [1] Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. [2] context Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models. [3]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. That places Wiley in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution. [1] context Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value. [2] context Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-1	Digital and physical publishing infrastructure create modest ecological impacts compared with heavier industries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Digital and physical publishing infrastructure create modest ecological impacts compared with heavier industries. [4]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Academic publishing contract, pricing, library-deal, and margin details are not transparent enough for strong public accountability. Academic publishing contract, pricing, library-deal, and margin details are not transparent enough for strong public accountability. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Academic publishing contract, pricing, library-deal, and margin details are not transparent enough for strong public accountability. [5]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Professional credential and academic publishing creates mild identity and career-dependence capture. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Professional credential and academic publishing creates mild identity and career-dependence capture. [6]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Wiley's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Wiley exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as… Wiley's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Wiley exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service. That warrants a substantial Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Wiley's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Wiley exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service. [7]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 65/100

7 verified linked claims 6 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 6/13 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

7 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 6/18

6 direct claims across 13 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 5/10

6/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Wiley is a public company rather than a scholar-, student-, reader-, or worker-owned publishing institution.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

WileyGeneral web source · 58%
Wiley investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

2Wiley publishes academic, professional, and educational materials with real informational value.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

WileyGeneral web source · 58%
Wiley investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

3Academic and professional publishing can impose high access costs and restrict knowledge through subscription and licensing models.

Calculation Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

WileyGeneral web source · 58%
Wiley investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

4Digital and physical publishing infrastructure create modest ecological impacts compared with heavier industries.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

WileyGeneral web source · 58%
Wiley investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

5Academic publishing contract, pricing, library-deal, and margin details are not transparent enough for strong public accountability.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

WileyGeneral web source · 58%
Wiley investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

6Professional credential and academic publishing creates mild identity and career-dependence capture.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

WileyGeneral web source · 58%
Wiley investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

7Wiley's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Wiley exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Wiley official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Wiley investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD60 Bookshare / Benetech nonprofit accessible-ebook library · same market AGOOD59 Creative Commons international nonprofit commons steward · same market AGOOD57 Internet Archive nonprofit digital library · same market AGOOD56 AK Press worker-owned independent book publisher and distributor · same market AGOOD56 Ghost Foundation nonprofit open-source publishing platform · same market AGOOD55 Little Free Library nonprofit neighborhood book-sharing network · same market AGOOD54 Consumer Reports independent nonprofit member organization · same market AGOOD53 Wikimedia Foundation nonprofit · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Wiley Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log