public company

3M

A public industrial manufacturer selling adhesives, filtration, safety, and materials products, with PFAS contamination, litigation, and product-harm exposure. 3M scores low because of ecological harm, documented human harm, and person-dependent governance, with weak stakeholder ownership and centralized governance reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: Industrial harm claims can dominate scores when evidence is sufficient.

Letter grade F Malignant High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score -27* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-27 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material15

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap15

Penalties-42

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Extraction2/10
Labor Sovereignty2/7
Solidarity with the Unemployed2/7

Penalties

Ecological Harm-22
Human Harm-8
Reversibility-5
Toxic Products-4

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims15
Direct axis claims15
Coverage15/15

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	0 / 10	3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 11 tied, 215 above on Ownership. Linked evidence 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 68 tied, 156 above on Governance. Linked evidence context 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1] 3M investor materials show shareholder governance, while PFAS and earplug accountability has depended heavily on litigation and settlement processes rather than affected-person control. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 20 scored entries below, 18 tied, 188 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1] 3M’s industrial-materials business created large private value while PFAS and Combat Arms Earplug settlements show major downstream costs borne by water systems and injured users. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 8 scored entries below, 36 tied, 182 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1] 3M’s public record centers corporate and litigation control over product-risk decisions, not worker or affected-community authority over hazardous product lines. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	2 / 7	3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 49 tied, 146 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1] 3M produces useful industrial and safety products, but the current record does not show structural solidarity for people outside employment or those harmed by product contamination. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 33 scored entries below, 14 tied, 179 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1] 3M’s PFAS and earplug settlements show the company bore costs only after mass litigation and public-water-system claims, indicating weak upfront loss-bearing fidelity. [6]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. That places 3M in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 22 tied, 173 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1] 3M’s market conduct is compromised because public-water suppliers and injured users needed litigation to address PFAS and earplug harms tied to sold products. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	2 / 5	3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. That places 3M in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 23 scored entries below, 13 tied, 190 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1] 3M makes useful industrial, medical, and consumer products, but PFAS liabilities and earplug injury litigation materially compromise product-integrity credit. [8]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. That places 3M in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 18 tied, 177 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1] 3M’s global industrial scale turned hazardous-material and product-safety failures into broad public-water and mass-injury problems. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	3M's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. 3M's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence context 3M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures. [1] 3M's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. [10]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-8	3M announced a settlement intended to resolve Combat Arms Earplug litigation claims involving alleged hearing injuries. 3M announced a settlement intended to resolve Combat Arms Earplug litigation claims involving alleged hearing injuries. That warrants a substantial Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 33 scored entries below, 4 tied, 189 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence 3M announced a settlement intended to resolve Combat Arms Earplug litigation claims involving alleged hearing injuries. [11]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-22	3M sits in the worst-actor Ecological Harm tier because PFAS contamination and water-supplier settlement evidence point to durable, widespread, and difficult-to-reverse chemical pollution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 4 tied, 222 above on Ecological Harm. Linked evidence 3M announced final court approval of a public-water-supplier PFAS settlement and identifies PFAS liabilities as material risk. [12]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	3M currently sells industrial and material products while PFAS exposure and liability are material to the current evidence record; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. 3M currently sells industrial and material products while PFAS exposure and liability are material to the current evidence record; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. That warrants a severe Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 6 tied, 218 above on Toxic Products. Linked evidence 3M currently sells industrial and material products while PFAS exposure and liability are material to the current evidence record; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. [14]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	3M litigation and settlement records is relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty because public accountability for earplug injury and PFAS liabilities depends heavily on mass litigation and settlement disclosures. 3M litigation and settlement records is relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty because public accountability for earplug injury and PFAS liabilities depends heavily on mass litigation and settlement disclosures. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence 3M litigation and settlement records is relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty because public accountability for earplug injury and PFAS liabilities depends heavily on mass litigation and settlement disclosures. [13]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	3M's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because 3M shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest,… 3M's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because 3M shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence 3M's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because 3M shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [15]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 85/100

15 verified linked claims 15 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 15/20

15 verified linked claims

Source quality 17/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

15 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

15/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

13M is a publicly traded company with shareholder-governed investor-relations structures.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

23M investor materials show shareholder governance, while PFAS and earplug accountability has depended heavily on litigation and settlement processes rather than affected-person control.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%
3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

33M’s industrial-materials business created large private value while PFAS and Combat Arms Earplug settlements show major downstream costs borne by water systems and injured users.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%
3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

43M’s public record centers corporate and litigation control over product-risk decisions, not worker or affected-community authority over hazardous product lines.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%
3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

53M produces useful industrial and safety products, but the current record does not show structural solidarity for people outside employment or those harmed by product contamination.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%
3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

63M’s PFAS and earplug settlements show the company bore costs only after mass litigation and public-water-system claims, indicating weak upfront loss-bearing fidelity.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%
3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

73M’s market conduct is compromised because public-water suppliers and injured users needed litigation to address PFAS and earplug harms tied to sold products.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%
3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

83M makes useful industrial, medical, and consumer products, but PFAS liabilities and earplug injury litigation materially compromise product-integrity credit.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%
3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

93M’s global industrial scale turned hazardous-material and product-safety failures into broad public-water and mass-injury problems.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%
3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

103M's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

113M announced a settlement intended to resolve Combat Arms Earplug litigation claims involving alleged hearing injuries.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

123M announced final court approval of a public-water-supplier PFAS settlement and identifies PFAS liabilities as material risk.

Ecological Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%

133M litigation and settlement records is relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty because public accountability for earplug injury and PFAS liabilities depends heavily on mass litigation and settlement disclosures.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

3M Combat Arms Earplugs litigation settlementPrimary public record · 100%

143M currently sells industrial and material products while PFAS exposure and liability are material to the current evidence record; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen.

Toxic Products Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
EPA: health and environmental risks of PFASPrimary public record · 100%

153M's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because 3M shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

3M official siteGeneral web source · 58%
3M investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
3M PFAS water settlement approvalPrimary public record · 100%

Alternatives

AGOOD58 Isthmus Engineering worker cooperative engineering firm · same market AGOOD55 New Era Windows worker cooperative manufacturer · same market BQUALIFIED49 MONDRAGON Corporation cooperative federation · Spain BQUALIFIED42 Scott Bader commonwealth-owned chemical company · United Kingdom

Competitors

AGOOD58 Isthmus Engineering worker cooperative engineering firm · same market AGOOD55 New Era Windows worker cooperative manufacturer · same market DEXTRACTIVE33 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories employee-owned engineering company · same market DEXTRACTIVE23 Recology employee-owned resource recovery company · same market DEXTRACTIVE12 W. L. Gore & Associates private employee-owned company · same market DEXTRACTIVE9 Henkel public consumer brands and adhesives company · same market DEXTRACTIVE5 Church & Dwight public household and personal-care manufacturer · same market DEXTRACTIVE5 Colgate-Palmolive public oral-care and consumer-products company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for 3M Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty -4 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding ai-scaffolding-score

Added tentative AI-generated claim-backed score components for a previously listed under-review company or group.

View Full Audit Log