commonwealth-owned chemical company

Scott Bader

A commonwealth-owned chemical company selling resins and specialty materials, with stewarded ownership but chemical footprint and product-harm constraints. Scott Bader scores well because ownership is comparatively aligned and governance has stronger accountability than peers, though ecological harm and toxic or materially harmful products still limit the evaluation.

Why this matters: Common-ownership structures need evaluation alongside product externalities.

Letter grade B Qualified High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score 42* B - Qualified

BQUALIFIED42 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material48

Bonus+0

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap48

Penalties-6

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

B - Qualified

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Ownership8/10
Governance7/10
Extraction7/10

Penalties

Ecological Harm-3
Toxic Products-2
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessPartial (AI)
Linked claims12
Direct axis claims12
Coverage12/12

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	8 / 10	Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. That places Scott Bader high on Ownership: decisive control is held by workers, users, members, or another stakeholder class rather than outside capital. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 168 scored entries below, 32 tied, 26 above on Ownership. Linked evidence Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	7 / 10	Scott Bader's commonwealth ownership places the company in a charitable trust structure rather than external shareholder control, supporting high but not fully worker-cooperative governance. Scott Bader's commonwealth ownership places the company in a charitable trust structure rather than external shareholder control, supporting high but not fully worker-cooperative governance. That places Scott Bader in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 163 scored entries below, 28 tied, 35 above on Governance. Linked evidence context Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. [1] Scott Bader's commonwealth ownership places the company in a charitable trust structure rather than external shareholder control, supporting high but not fully worker-cooperative governance. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	7 / 10	Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. That places Scott Bader in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 140 scored entries below, 32 tied, 54 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. [1] Scott Bader says its Commonwealth model distributes a share of profits to public-benefit projects and is proudly employee owned. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	5 / 7	Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. That places Scott Bader in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 152 scored entries below, 40 tied, 34 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. [1] Scott Bader identifies as employee owned, giving colleagues an ownership-linked structure in a chemicals and materials business. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	5 / 7	Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. That places Scott Bader in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 158 scored entries below, 38 tied, 30 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. [1] Scott Bader Commonwealth funds projects intended to improve communities and wider social impact beyond customers and employees. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	5 / 7	Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. That places Scott Bader in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 119 scored entries below, 43 tied, 64 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. [1] Scott Bader's Commonwealth structure explicitly allocates a portion of profits toward external public-benefit work rather than treating all surplus as company-retained value. [6]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. That places Scott Bader in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 54 scored entries below, 51 tied, 121 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. [1] Scott Bader sells specialty chemicals and materials through an employee-owned Commonwealth model, mixing useful industrial production with chemical-sector externality risk. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. That places Scott Bader high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 61 scored entries below, 72 tied, 93 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. [1] Scott Bader's products are specialty chemicals and materials, a useful but risk-bearing product category partially constrained by its Commonwealth commitments. [8]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	4 / 5	Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. That places Scott Bader high on Scale Integrity: growth appears compatible with accountability, quality, and stakeholder benefit. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 109 scored entries below, 81 tied, 36 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders. [1] Scott Bader has maintained a Commonwealth employee-ownership model while operating as an international specialty chemicals company. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-3	Scott Bader publishes sustainability information for a global chemicals business, making chemical footprint and trajectory material. Scott Bader publishes sustainability information for a global chemicals business, making chemical footprint and trajectory material. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 43 scored entries below, 9 tied, 174 above on Ecological Harm. Linked evidence Scott Bader publishes sustainability information for a global chemicals business, making chemical footprint and trajectory material. [10]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Scott Bader currently sells chemical and materials products, so toxic-substance screening is material even with commonwealth ownership; the product category creates ordinary toxic,… Scott Bader currently sells chemical and materials products, so toxic-substance screening is material even with commonwealth ownership; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. That warrants a substantial Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 14 scored entries below, 9 tied, 203 above on Toxic Products. Linked evidence Scott Bader currently sells chemical and materials products, so toxic-substance screening is material even with commonwealth ownership; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. [11]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Scott Bader's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Scott Bader shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise,… Scott Bader's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Scott Bader shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Scott Bader's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Scott Bader shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [12]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 80/100

12 verified linked claims 12 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 12/12 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

12 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

12 direct claims across 12 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

12/12 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessPartial (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Scott Bader describes a commonwealth ownership structure in which the company is held by a charitable trust rather than external shareholders.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

Scott Bader CommonwealthGeneral web source · 58%

2Scott Bader's commonwealth ownership places the company in a charitable trust structure rather than external shareholder control, supporting high but not fully worker-cooperative governance.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Scott Bader commonwealthGeneral web source · 58%

4Scott Bader identifies as employee owned, giving colleagues an ownership-linked structure in a chemicals and materials business.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Scott Bader CommonwealthGeneral web source · 58%
Scott Bader aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

7Scott Bader sells specialty chemicals and materials through an employee-owned Commonwealth model, mixing useful industrial production with chemical-sector externality risk.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Scott Bader aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Scott Bader CommonwealthGeneral web source · 58%

8Scott Bader's products are specialty chemicals and materials, a useful but risk-bearing product category partially constrained by its Commonwealth commitments.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Scott Bader aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Scott Bader CommonwealthGeneral web source · 58%

9Scott Bader has maintained a Commonwealth employee-ownership model while operating as an international specialty chemicals company.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Scott Bader aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Scott Bader CommonwealthGeneral web source · 58%

10Scott Bader publishes sustainability information for a global chemicals business, making chemical footprint and trajectory material.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

Scott Bader sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%

11Scott Bader currently sells chemical and materials products, so toxic-substance screening is material even with commonwealth ownership; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Scott Bader CommonwealthGeneral web source · 58%
EPA chemicals under TSCAPrimary public record · 100%

12Scott Bader's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Scott Bader shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Scott Bader official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Scott Bader CommonwealthGeneral web source · 58%
Scott Bader sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD58 Isthmus Engineering worker cooperative engineering firm · United States AGOOD55 New Era Windows worker cooperative manufacturer · United States BQUALIFIED49 MONDRAGON Corporation cooperative federation · Spain DEXTRACTIVE34 Bosch foundation-controlled company · Germany DEXTRACTIVE33 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories employee-owned engineering company · United States DEXTRACTIVE24 Siemens public company · Germany DEXTRACTIVE23 Recology employee-owned resource recovery company · United States DEXTRACTIVE12 W. L. Gore & Associates private employee-owned company · United States

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Scott Bader Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty -2 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding ai-scaffolding-score

Added tentative AI-generated claim-backed score components for a previously listed under-review company or group.

View Full Audit Log