employee-owned engineering company
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories
Industry Manufacturing
An employee-owned engineering company selling electric-grid protection and automation products, with infrastructure value and limited democratic governance. Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories lands in the middle because ownership is comparatively aligned and the model leaves more value with stakeholders, but person-dependent governance prevents a stronger rating.
Why this matters: Infrastructure suppliers affect public systems and should be compared with ordinary shareholder firms.
Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
D - Extractive
The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.
Strengths
- Ownership6/10
- Extraction6/10
- Labor Sovereignty5/7
Penalties
- Reversibility-5
- Policy Capture-5
Evidence state
- ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessPartial (AI)
- Linked claims12
- Direct axis claims11
- Coverage11/11
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories states that it is 100 percent employee owned. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
4 / 10 |
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories states that it is 100 percent employee owned. |
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
6 / 10 |
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories states that it is 100 percent employee owned. |
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
SEL presents employee ownership as part of its company model, which strengthens worker economic participation but does not establish full cooperative governance. |
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
4 / 7 |
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories states that it is 100 percent employee owned. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
5 / 7 |
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories states that it is 100 percent employee owned. |
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
4 / 5 |
SEL designs, manufactures, and supports products for electric power system protection, automation, and control. Linked evidence |
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
SEL designs, manufactures, and supports products for electric power system protection, automation, and control. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
4 / 5 |
SEL designs, manufactures, and supports products for electric power system protection, automation, and control. |
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Reversibility
?
Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders,
founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather
than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. Linked evidence
|
Policy Capture
?
Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes,
enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental,
healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy
against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or
ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely
because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.
|
-5 |
OpenLobby records SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, INC. lobbying on trade, aviation, energy, immigration, labor, consumer protection, and other issues with about $1.2M in spending… Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
No bonus credits applied in this version.
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
High 80/100
12 verified linked claims 11 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 11/11 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 16/20
12 verified linked claims
Source quality 11/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 14/18
11 direct claims across 11 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 10/10
11/11 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories states that it is 100 percent employee owned.
- SEL companyGeneral web source · 58%
2SEL states that it is 100 percent employee owned, giving employees a material ownership stake while not establishing a one-worker-one-vote cooperative governance structure.
- SEL companyGeneral web source · 58%
- SEL employee ownershipOfficial self-description · 68%
3SEL's 100 percent employee ownership routes enterprise value toward employees rather than outside shareholders in an electric power systems manufacturing business.
- SEL employee ownershipOfficial self-description · 68%
4SEL presents employee ownership as part of its company model, which strengthens worker economic participation but does not establish full cooperative governance.
- SEL employee ownershipOfficial self-description · 68%
5SEL designs and supports electric power system protection and automation products, giving public infrastructure value while not documenting broad protections for people outside current employees and customers.
- SEL companyGeneral web source · 58%
6SEL's employee ownership and power-system support model tie product obligations to an employee-owned manufacturer rather than short-term shareholder extraction.
- SEL employee ownershipOfficial self-description · 68%
- SEL companyGeneral web source · 58%
7SEL designs, manufactures, and supports products for electric power system protection, automation, and control.
- SEL solutionsGeneral web source · 58%
8SEL sells protection, automation, and control products for electric power systems, serving critical infrastructure customers through a specialized employee-owned model.
- SEL companyGeneral web source · 58%
9SEL's employee-owned model has scaled into critical power-system infrastructure without becoming a public shareholder-controlled company.
- SEL employee ownershipOfficial self-description · 68%
- SEL companyGeneral web source · 58%
10Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure.
- SEL companyGeneral web source · 58%
11Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories's public materials state a mission, values, ownership model, advocacy role, or institutional standpoint plainly enough that this record does not identify penalty-level neutrality theater.
- Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories official siteGeneral web source · 58%
- SEL companyGeneral web source · 58%
- SEL solutionsGeneral web source · 58%
12OpenLobby records SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, INC. lobbying on trade, aviation, energy, immigration, labor, consumer protection, and other issues with about $1.2M in spending across 29 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.
- OpenLobby — SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, INC. lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty 0 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.
Rechecked evidence coverage and source quality during the evaluation-quality pass; confidence now reflects direct source coverage, complexity, and remaining uncertainty rather than score direction.
Added tentative AI-generated claim-backed score components for a previously listed under-review company or group.