board-game community platform
BoardGameGeek
Industry Entertainment
A long-running board-game database, forum, marketplace, and community reference site for tabletop games and players. BoardGameGeek lands in the middle because the model leaves more value with stakeholders and the institution is less hostile to people with weak bargaining power, but identity capture and ideological disavowal prevent a stronger rating.
Why this matters: BoardGameGeek is a positive tabletop infrastructure case: it creates public knowledge and community value, with ordinary private-platform governance limitations.
Letter grade C Performative Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
C - Performative
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Identity Capture.
Strengths
- Extraction7/10
- Solidarity with the Unemployed5/7
- Loss-Bearing Fidelity5/7
Penalties
- Identity Capture-1
- Ideological Disavowal-1
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims8
- Direct axis claims7
- Coverage7/14
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
4 / 10 |
BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
4 / 10 |
BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
7 / 10 |
BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
4 / 7 |
BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
5 / 7 |
BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
5 / 7 |
BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
4 / 5 |
BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
BoardGameGeek provides a major public database, forums, marketplace, ratings, and reference infrastructure for tabletop games. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
5 / 5 |
BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Identity Capture
?
Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation.
Range: -3 to 0.
|
-1 |
BoardGameGeek creates substantial community value, while private governance and reputation/status dynamics limit the score. Linked evidence
|
Ideological Disavowal
?
Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional
necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or
non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.
|
-1 |
BoardGameGeek's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because BoardGameGeek shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise,… Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
1 / 3 |
BoardGameGeek creates substantial community value, while private governance and reputation/status dynamics limit the score. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
2 / 3 |
BoardGameGeek creates substantial community value, while private governance and reputation/status dynamics limit the score. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
1 / 3 |
BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 68/100
8 verified linked claims 7 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 7/14 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
8 verified linked claims
Source quality 12/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 9/18
7 direct claims across 14 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
7/14 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons.
- BoardGameGeek aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- BoardGameGeek marketplaceGeneral web source · 58%
2BoardGameGeek provides a major public database, forums, marketplace, ratings, and reference infrastructure for tabletop games.
- BoardGameGeek aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- BoardGameGeek marketplaceGeneral web source · 58%
3BoardGameGeek creates substantial community value, while private governance and reputation/status dynamics limit the score.
- BoardGameGeek community guidelinesGeneral web source · 58%
4BoardGameGeek creates substantial community value, while private governance and reputation/status dynamics limit the score.
- BoardGameGeek aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- BoardGameGeek marketplaceGeneral web source · 58%
5BoardGameGeek creates substantial community value, while private governance and reputation/status dynamics limit the score.
- BoardGameGeek aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- BoardGameGeek marketplaceGeneral web source · 58%
6BoardGameGeek is a privately controlled community platform rather than a member-owned commons.
- BoardGameGeek aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- BoardGameGeek marketplaceGeneral web source · 58%
7BoardGameGeek creates substantial community value, while private governance and reputation/status dynamics limit the score.
- BoardGameGeek community guidelinesGeneral web source · 58%
8BoardGameGeek's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because BoardGameGeek shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.
- BoardGameGeek official siteGeneral web source · 58%
- BoardGameGeek aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- BoardGameGeek marketplaceGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for BoardGameGeek Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log