independent game marketplace
itch.io
Industry Entertainment
An independent digital marketplace for indie games, game jams, tools, assets, zines, and pay-what-you-want creator distribution. itch.io scores well because the model leaves more value with stakeholders and the institution is less hostile to people with weak bargaining power, though ideological disavowal still limits the evaluation.
Why this matters: itch.io is a strong good-games alternative: unusually creator-friendly market conduct, low lock-in, and public access for small developers, though not democratically owned.
Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
A - Good
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Ideological Disavowal.
Strengths
- Extraction7/10
- Ownership5/10
- Governance5/10
Penalties
- Ideological Disavowal-1
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims7
- Direct axis claims6
- Coverage6/13
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
5 / 10 |
itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
5 / 10 |
itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
7 / 10 |
itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
5 / 7 |
itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
5 / 7 |
itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 |
itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
itch.io gives independent creators a marketplace for games, assets, jams, and pay-what-you-want distribution. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
5 / 5 |
itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Ideological Disavowal
?
Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional
necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or
non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.
|
-1 |
itch.io's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because itch.io shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise,… Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
2 / 3 |
itch.io’s open revenue-share and creator-first design describes conduct considered under Openness to Dissent compared with major platform stores. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
2 / 3 |
itch.io’s open revenue-share and creator-first design describes conduct considered under Good Deal compared with major platform stores. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
2 / 3 |
itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 64/100
7 verified linked claims 6 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 6/13 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
7 verified linked claims
Source quality 12/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 6/18
6 direct claims across 13 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
6/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance.
- itch.io aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- itch.io creator pricing / open revenue sharingGeneral web source · 58%
2itch.io gives independent creators a marketplace for games, assets, jams, and pay-what-you-want distribution.
- itch.io aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- itch.io creator pricing / open revenue sharingGeneral web source · 58%
3itch.io’s open revenue-share and creator-first design describes conduct considered under Calculation compared with major platform stores.
- itch.io browse gamesGeneral web source · 58%
4itch.io’s open revenue-share and creator-first design describes conduct considered under Openness to Dissent compared with major platform stores.
- itch.io aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- itch.io creator pricing / open revenue sharingGeneral web source · 58%
5itch.io’s open revenue-share and creator-first design describes conduct considered under Good Deal compared with major platform stores.
- itch.io aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- itch.io creator pricing / open revenue sharingGeneral web source · 58%
6itch.io is independently/private controlled rather than worker-owned, but it avoids public shareholder governance.
- itch.io aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- itch.io creator pricing / open revenue sharingGeneral web source · 58%
7itch.io's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because itch.io shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.
- itch.io official siteGeneral web source · 58%
- itch.io aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- itch.io creator pricing / open revenue sharingGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for itch.io Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log