civil resistance network
Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943
Industry Historical
Danish resistance and civil society during the October 1943 rescue of most Danish Jews to Sweden. It scores as a rare historical good because ordinary civic networks bore risk to protect a targeted minority from Nazi deportation.
Why this matters: This is a positive anchor for loss-bearing fidelity under occupation.
Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
A - Good
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Accountability Opacity.
Strengths
- Extraction9/10
- Ownership8/10
- Governance7/10
Penalties
- Accountability Opacity-2
- Coercive Violence-1
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims17
- Direct axis claims16
- Coverage15/15
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
8 / 10 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
7 / 10 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
9 / 10 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
7 / 7 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
7 / 7 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
4 / 5 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
4 / 5 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Coercive Violence
?
Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse,
armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or
nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to
confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.
|
-1 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability
structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
|
-2 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
3 / 3 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Constitutional Spirit
?
Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms
even where private law does not strictly require it.
|
3 / 3 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
1 / 3 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Anti-Scapegoating Culture
?
Credit for documented non-punitive practices that prevent scapegoating,
mobbing, and isolate-and-expel dynamics. Ordinary civility, peer
support, or anti-bullying branding is not enough; the practice must also
avoid public shaming, punitive pile-ons, and scapegoating of alleged
scapegoaters.
|
2 / 3 |
The year 1943 is chosen because the rescue made civic solidarity concrete and costly. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 77/100
17 verified linked claims 16 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/15 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 14/20
17 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 14/18
16 direct claims across 15 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 10/10
15/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943: Britannica describes the Danish resistance rescue of nearly all Jews in Denmark.
- Britannica: Denmark in the 20th centuryGeneral web source · 58%
2Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943: Britannica notes that occupied Denmark rescued most of its Jews by sea to Sweden.
- Britannica: Holocaust, EinsatzgruppenGeneral web source · 58%
3Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for ownership based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
4Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for governance based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
5Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for extraction based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
6Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for labor sovereignty based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
7Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for solidarity unemployed based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
8Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for loss bearing fidelity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
9Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for market conduct based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
10Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for product integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
11Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for scale integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
12Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for openness to dissent based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
13Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for constitutional spirit based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
14Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for good deal based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
15Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for anti scapegoating culture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
16Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for coercive violence based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
17Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 has a year-specific historical finding for disclosure based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log