Buddhist nationalist movement

Ma Ba Tha @ 2017

A Myanmar Buddhist nationalist movement evaluated during the Rohingya crisis era. It scores as malignant because religious identity, nationalist politics, anti-Muslim mobilization, and public pressure contributed to an atmosphere of persecution rather than protective community practice.

Why this matters: Ma Ba Tha is a calibration point for non-state religious nationalism amplifying ethnic violence.

Letter grade F Malignant High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 14, 2026

Final Score -43* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-43 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material8

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap8

Penalties-51

Policy Capture: L for Lobbying

The L badge appears when the Policy Capture penalty is severe. Here, L stands for Lobbying: the policy-capture value is -10, meaning the evidence indicates major private-interest lobbying or policy pressure against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, democratic accountability, or ecological life.

Evidence: [13]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Scale Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Coercive Violence.

Strengths

Scale Integrity3/5
Extraction2/10
Governance1/10

Penalties

Coercive Violence-12
Human Harm-10
Policy Capture-10
Reversibility-5

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims19
Direct axis claims19
Coverage19/19

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	0 / 10	No Ownership value is applied to Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 gave ordinary adherents, victims, or affected outsiders no real ownership control over the institution. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 sits at 1 on Governance because ma Ba Tha @ 2017 concentrated rule in religious, ideological, military, or charismatic authority rather than democratic affected-stakeholder governance.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 concentrated rule in religious, ideological, military, or charismatic authority rather than democratic affected-stakeholder governance. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 sits at 2 on Extraction because ma Ba Tha @ 2017 extracted labor, obedience, territory, property, money, or life chances from adherents or outsiders under coercive authority.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 extracted labor, obedience, territory, property, money, or life chances from adherents or outsiders under coercive authority. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 sits at 1 on Labor Sovereignty because ma Ba Tha @ 2017 subordinated ordinary work, obedience, family life, or bodily autonomy to institutional command.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 subordinated ordinary work, obedience, family life, or bodily autonomy to institutional command. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	0 / 7	No Solidarity Unemployed value is applied to Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 treated outsiders, dissenters, apostates, enemies, or weak members as expendable rather than as people owed solidarity. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	0 / 7	No Loss Bearing Fidelity value is applied to Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 shifted loss onto members, victims, outsiders, or targeted communities rather than bearing institutional cost for repair. [6]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 sits at 1 on Market Conduct because ma Ba Tha @ 2017 controlled participation through coercion, fear, identity, territory, or salvation claims rather than fair exchange.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 controlled participation through coercion, fear, identity, territory, or salvation claims rather than fair exchange. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	0 / 5	No Product Integrity value is applied to Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's institutional output degraded into domination, fear, or violence rather than reliable spiritual or public benefit. [8]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 sits at 3 on Scale Integrity because ma Ba Tha @ 2017's growth magnified coercion because scale expanded institutional reach over victims, adherents, or territory.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's growth magnified coercion because scale expanded institutional reach over victims, adherents, or territory. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because ma Ba Tha @ 2017's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.. Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because ma Ba Tha @ 2017's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control. [10]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-10	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -10 on Human Harm because ma Ba Tha's Buddhist nationalist politics and anti-Muslim mobilization made minority-targeting harm material during the Rohingya crisis era.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha's Buddhist nationalist politics and anti-Muslim mobilization made minority-targeting harm material during the Rohingya crisis era. [11]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-12	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -12 on Coercive Violence because ma Ba Tha was not the state military, so it sits above direct armed perpetrators, but its religious-nationalist pressure helped legitimate coercive conditions.. Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -12 on Coercive Violence because ma Ba Tha was not the state military, so it sits above direct armed perpetrators, but its religious-nationalist pressure helped legitimate coercive conditions.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha was not the state military, so it sits above direct armed perpetrators, but its religious-nationalist pressure helped legitimate coercive conditions. [12]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-10	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -10 on Policy Capture because ma Ba Tha @ 2017 sought or exercised rule over law, territory, public order, or civic life through religious or ideological command.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 sought or exercised rule over law, territory, public order, or civic life through religious or ideological command. [13]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -2 on Youth Capture because ma Ba Tha @ 2017 serves or forms young people through religious education, youth ministry, schools, family culture, or identity… Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -2 on Youth Capture because ma Ba Tha @ 2017 serves or forms young people through religious education, youth ministry, schools, family culture, or identity formation; the scoring depends on whether that work becomes manipulative capture.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 serves or forms young people through religious education, youth ministry, schools, family culture, or identity formation; the scoring depends on whether that work becomes manipulative capture. [14]
Unilateral Terms ? Non-negotiable clickthrough or adhesion terms that turn ordinary customer, user, subscriber, patient, tenant, or public-facing access into a one-sided contract, especially forced arbitration, class-action or mass-action waivers, unilateral modification, venue restrictions, broad indemnity, account termination discretion, or essential-service access conditioned on unreadable terms. Range: -5 to 0.	-3	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -3 on Unilateral Terms because ma Ba Tha @ 2017's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually.. Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -3 on Unilateral Terms because ma Ba Tha @ 2017's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually. [15]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -2 on Accountability Opacity because ma Ba Tha @ 2017's internal authority, violence, abuse, or decision-making was opaque to affected people and outsiders.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's internal authority, violence, abuse, or decision-making was opaque to affected people and outsiders. [16]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -3 on Identity Capture because ma Ba Tha fused Buddhism, nationality, ethnicity, gender anxiety, and anti-Muslim identity into a majoritarian mobilization structure.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha fused Buddhism, nationality, ethnicity, gender anxiety, and anti-Muslim identity into a majoritarian mobilization structure. [17]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -1 on Surveillance Capture because ma Ba Tha @ 2017 used fear, informant dynamics, internal discipline, or coercive monitoring rather than open civic accountability.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 used fear, informant dynamics, internal discipline, or coercive monitoring rather than open civic accountability. [18]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 is penalized at -3 on Ideological Disavowal because ma Ba Tha @ 2017 justified domination as sacred truth, purity, salvation, order, or necessity rather than admitting institutional interest and coercion.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 justified domination as sacred truth, purity, salvation, order, or necessity rather than admitting institutional interest and coercion. [19]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 87/100

19 verified linked claims 19 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 19/19 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 20/20

19 verified linked claims

Source quality 15/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

19 direct claims across 19 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 14, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

19/19 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 gave ordinary adherents, victims, or affected outsiders no real ownership control over the institution.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

2Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 concentrated rule in religious, ideological, military, or charismatic authority rather than democratic affected-stakeholder governance.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

3Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 extracted labor, obedience, territory, property, money, or life chances from adherents or outsiders under coercive authority.

Extraction Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

4Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 subordinated ordinary work, obedience, family life, or bodily autonomy to institutional command.

Labor Sovereignty Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

5Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 treated outsiders, dissenters, apostates, enemies, or weak members as expendable rather than as people owed solidarity.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

6Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 shifted loss onto members, victims, outsiders, or targeted communities rather than bearing institutional cost for repair.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

7Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 controlled participation through coercion, fear, identity, territory, or salvation claims rather than fair exchange.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

8Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's institutional output degraded into domination, fear, or violence rather than reliable spiritual or public benefit.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

9Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's growth magnified coercion because scale expanded institutional reach over victims, adherents, or territory.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

10Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.

Reversibility Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

11Ma Ba Tha's Buddhist nationalist politics and anti-Muslim mobilization made minority-targeting harm material during the Rohingya crisis era.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

12Ma Ba Tha was not the state military, so it sits above direct armed perpetrators, but its religious-nationalist pressure helped legitimate coercive conditions.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

13Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 sought or exercised rule over law, territory, public order, or civic life through religious or ideological command.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

14Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 serves or forms young people through religious education, youth ministry, schools, family culture, or identity formation; the scoring depends on whether that work becomes manipulative capture.

Youth Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

15Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually.

Unilateral Terms Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

16Ma Ba Tha @ 2017's internal authority, violence, abuse, or decision-making was opaque to affected people and outsiders.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

17Ma Ba Tha fused Buddhism, nationality, ethnicity, gender anxiety, and anti-Muslim identity into a majoritarian mobilization structure.

Identity Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

18Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 used fear, informant dynamics, internal discipline, or coercive monitoring rather than open civic accountability.

Surveillance Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

19Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 justified domination as sacred truth, purity, salvation, order, or necessity rather than admitting institutional interest and coercion.

Ideological Disavowal Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

International Crisis Group: Buddhism and state power in MyanmarGeneral web source · 58%
Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Rohingya crisisGeneral web source · 58%
Reuters: Myanmar Buddhist nationalist group Ma Ba ThaIndependent reporting · 82%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD62 Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 civil resistance network · same market AGOOD58 Mondragon Cooperative Movement @ 1956 worker cooperative founding movement · same market AGOOD58 Solidarity Poland @ 1980 independent trade union movement · same market BQUALIFIED44 Haitian Revolution @ 1804 liberation movement and new state · same market CPERFORMATIVE35 New Deal United States @ 1935 reform government · same market DEXTRACTIVE31 Paris Commune @ 1871 revolutionary municipal government · same market FMALIGNANT-30 Roman Empire @ 117 CE ancient empire · same market FMALIGNANT-69 Apartheid South Africa @ 1985 racial authoritarian state · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log