reform government

New Deal United States @ 1935

The United States during the Second New Deal, when relief, jobs programs, public works, labor protections, and regulatory reforms materially changed state obligations during depression. It scores in the qualified middle because it expanded public loss-bearing and employment support while preserving racial exclusions, hierarchy, and state coercion.

Why this matters: This is a positive-but-limited anchor for large-state public obligation.

Letter grade C Performative Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 12, 2026

Final Score 35* C - Performative

CPERFORMATIVE35 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material45

Bonus+8

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap53

Penalties-18

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

C - Performative

The score turns mainly on Solidarity with the Unemployed, with the largest penalty coming from Human Harm.

Strengths

Solidarity with the Unemployed7/7
Extraction6/10
Loss-Bearing Fidelity6/7

Penalties

Human Harm-3
Policy Capture-3
Debt Peonage-3
Coercive Violence-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims25
Direct axis claims25
Coverage23/23

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	3 / 10	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Ownership, the snapshot shows real institutional capacity or public value, but power is still incomplete, unstable, or not directly answerable to affected people. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for ownership based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	5 / 10	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Governance, the snapshot shows real institutional capacity or public value, but power is still incomplete, unstable, or not directly answerable to affected people. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for governance based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [4]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	6 / 10	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Extraction, the snapshot shows real institutional capacity or public value, but power is still incomplete, unstable, or not directly answerable to affected people. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for extraction based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [5]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	5 / 7	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Labor Sovereignty, the snapshot shows real institutional capacity or public value, but power is still incomplete, unstable, or not directly answerable to affected people. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for labor sovereignty based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [6]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	7 / 7	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, the snapshot shows unusually strong stakeholder or public-serving power for a historical institution. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for solidarity unemployed based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [7]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	6 / 7	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, the snapshot shows real institutional capacity or public value, but power is still incomplete, unstable, or not directly answerable to affected people. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for loss bearing fidelity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [8]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Market Conduct, the snapshot shows real institutional capacity or public value, but power is still incomplete, unstable, or not directly answerable to affected people. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for market conduct based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Product Integrity, the snapshot shows real institutional capacity or public value, but power is still incomplete, unstable, or not directly answerable to affected people. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for product integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [10]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Scale Integrity, the snapshot shows real institutional capacity or public value, but power is still incomplete, unstable, or not directly answerable to affected people. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for scale integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [11]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-3	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Human Harm, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for human harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [17]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-2	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Coercive Violence, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for coercive violence based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [18]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-2	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Ecological Harm, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for ecological harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [19]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-3	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Policy Capture, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for policy capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [20]
Debt Peonage ? Coercive or structurally inescapable debt systems, including bankruptcy-resistant student debt, compelled servicing relationships, wage or benefit garnishment leverage, distressed-debt buying, debt collection, or refinancing practices that turn education, medical care, housing, household necessity, or public obligation into long-term debtor control. Ordinary transparent lending is not penalized by itself. Range: -12 to 0.	-3	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Debt Peonage, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for debt peonage based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [21]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Accountability Opacity, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for disclosure based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [22]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Identity Capture, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for identity capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [23]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Surveillance Capture, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for surveillance capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [24]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Ideological Disavowal, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for ideological disavowal based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [25]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	2 / 3	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Openness to Dissent, the dated evidence shows a rare positive practice for its historical context, but the credit is limited by the institution's surrounding coercion, instability, or incomplete accountability. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for openness to dissent based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [12]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Constitutional Spirit, the dated evidence shows a rare positive practice for its historical context, but the credit is limited by the institution's surrounding coercion, instability, or incomplete accountability. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for constitutional spirit based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [13]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	2 / 3	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Good Deal, the dated evidence shows a rare positive practice for its historical context, but the credit is limited by the institution's surrounding coercion, instability, or incomplete accountability. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for good deal based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [14]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Cost Transparency, the dated evidence shows a rare positive practice for its historical context, but the credit is limited by the institution's surrounding coercion, instability, or incomplete accountability. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for cost transparency based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [15]
Anti-Scapegoating Culture ? Credit for documented non-punitive practices that prevent scapegoating, mobbing, and isolate-and-expel dynamics. Ordinary civility, peer support, or anti-bullying branding is not enough; the practice must also avoid public shaming, punitive pile-ons, and scapegoating of alleged scapegoaters.	1 / 3	The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. The year 1935 captures the reform program at its strongest domestic public-obligation moment. It is not an A because the state still carried racial exclusion and coercive hierarchy, but it belongs above ordinary liberal administration because unemployment relief became a central public duty. On Anti-Scapegoating Culture, the dated evidence shows a rare positive practice for its historical context, but the credit is limited by the institution's surrounding coercion, instability, or incomplete accountability. Compared with current directory entries, New Deal United States @ 1935 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1935, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms. [1] context New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures. [2] New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for anti scapegoating culture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [16]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 77/100

25 verified linked claims 25 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 23/23 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

25 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

25 direct claims across 23 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

23/23 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes WPA, CCC, emergency aid, jobs, TVA, and regulated-economy reforms.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Britannica: New DealGeneral web source · 58%

2New Deal United States @ 1935: Britannica describes emergency relief and work-creation measures.

Human Harm Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Britannica: United States, Great DepressionGeneral web source · 58%

3New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for ownership based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

4New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for governance based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

5New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for extraction based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

6New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for labor sovereignty based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

7New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for solidarity unemployed based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

8New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for loss bearing fidelity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

9New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for market conduct based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

10New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for product integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

11New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for scale integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

12New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for openness to dissent based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

13New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for constitutional spirit based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

14New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for good deal based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

15New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for cost transparency based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

16New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for anti scapegoating culture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Anti Scapegoating Culture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

17New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for human harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

18New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for coercive violence based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Coercive Violence Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

19New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for ecological harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

20New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for policy capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

21New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for debt peonage based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Debt Peonage Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

22New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for disclosure based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

23New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for identity capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

24New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for surveillance capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

25New Deal United States @ 1935 has a year-specific historical finding for ideological disavowal based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

New Deal United States @ 1935 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD62 Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 civil resistance network · same market AGOOD58 Mondragon Cooperative Movement @ 1956 worker cooperative founding movement · same market AGOOD58 Solidarity Poland @ 1980 independent trade union movement · same market BQUALIFIED44 Haitian Revolution @ 1804 liberation movement and new state · same market DEXTRACTIVE31 Paris Commune @ 1871 revolutionary municipal government · same market FMALIGNANT-30 Roman Empire @ 117 CE ancient empire · same market FMALIGNANT-43 Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 Buddhist nationalist movement · same market FMALIGNANT-69 Apartheid South Africa @ 1985 racial authoritarian state · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for New Deal United States @ 1935 Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log