board and card game publisher

Fantasy Flight Games

A major tabletop publisher behind Arkham Horror, Twilight Imperium, Star Wars games, Marvel Champions, and living-card-game systems, owned through Asmodee. Fantasy Flight Games remains weak because of identity capture, ecological harm, and ideological disavowal, even where the product or service has practical value.

Why this matters: Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score.

Letter grade D Extractive Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Parent / owner: Asmodee Last reviewed May 7, 2026

Fantasy Flight Games is part of Asmodee, which is also listed separately.

Final Score 22* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE22 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material27

Bonus+2

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap29

Penalties-7

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Owned by Asmodee

The parent profile is currently rated D (Extractive, 22*). This subsidiary is not mechanically capped at the parent score, but parent control is part of the ownership, governance, policy, accountability opacity, reversibility, and harm analysis.

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Identity Capture.

Strengths

Product Integrity5/5
Extraction4/10
Labor Sovereignty3/7

Penalties

Identity Capture-3
Ecological Harm-2
Youth Capture-1
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims9
Direct axis claims8
Coverage8/15

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That keeps Fantasy Flight Games low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	4 / 10	Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Fantasy Flight Games in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Fantasy Flight Games in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	3 / 7	Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Fantasy Flight Games in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Fantasy Flight Games in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Fantasy Flight Games in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. That places Fantasy Flight Games high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [3]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Fantasy Flight Games in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-2	Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [6]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. That warrants a limited Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [7]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. That warrants a severe Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [8]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Fantasy Flight Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Fantasy Flight Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened… Fantasy Flight Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Fantasy Flight Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Fantasy Flight Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Fantasy Flight Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [9]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	1 / 3	Fantasy Flight Games offers substantial play value in many titles, even though expansion cycles, licensed IP, and living-card-game models limit the Good Deal bonus. Fantasy Flight Games offers substantial play value in many titles, even though expansion cycles, licensed IP, and living-card-game models limit the Good Deal bonus. That supports partial Good Deal credit because ordinary users receive unusually fair value, durability, access, or surplus. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Fantasy Flight Games offers substantial play value in many titles, even though expansion cycles, licensed IP, and living-card-game models limit the Good Deal bonus. [4]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. That supports partial Cost Transparency credit because pricing, margins, fees, funding, or surplus allocation are made meaningfully legible. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score. [5]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 68/100

9 verified linked claims 8 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 8/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

9 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

8 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 5/10

8/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Fantasy Flight Games has public-company subsidiary control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Fantasy Flight Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Asmodee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

2Fantasy Flight Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Fantasy Flight Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Asmodee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

3Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score.

Calculation Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Fantasy Flight Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Asmodee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

4Fantasy Flight Games offers substantial play value in many titles, even though expansion cycles, licensed IP, and living-card-game models limit the Good Deal bonus.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Fantasy Flight GamesGeneral web source · 58%
Fantasy Flight Games productsGeneral web source · 58%

5Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Fantasy Flight Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Asmodee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

6Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Fantasy Flight Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Asmodee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

7Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Fantasy Flight Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Asmodee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

8Fantasy Flight is a major board/card game anchor: high craft and cultural value, but subsidiary ownership, licensed IP, expansion cycles, and identity capture limit the score.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Fantasy Flight Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Asmodee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

9Fantasy Flight Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Fantasy Flight Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Fantasy Flight Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Fantasy Flight Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Asmodee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD63 Future Club employee-owned cooperative game studio · same market AGOOD63 KO_OP worker-owned game studio · same market AGOOD63 Motion Twin worker cooperative game studio · same market AGOOD61 Means Interactive cooperative game publisher · same market AGOOD56 Stocksy United artist cooperative platform · same market AGOOD52 itch.io independent game marketplace · same market AGOOD50 The Game Crafter independent tabletop game manufacturing marketplace · same market BQUALIFIED48 ConcernedApe independent game developer and publisher · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Fantasy Flight Games Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log