writing software company
Scrivener / Literature & Latte
Industry Publishing
Long-form writing software used by novelists, nonfiction authors, academics, screenwriters, and other writers. Scrivener scores well because it supports durable creative work without royalty capture or platform distribution dependence.
Why this matters: Scrivener matters as author infrastructure because it offers durable software with low capture and no rights or royalty claim, though it remains proprietary private software.
Letter grade B Qualified Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
B - Qualified
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.
Strengths
- Extraction7/10
- Loss-Bearing Fidelity6/7
- Governance5/10
Penalties
- Reversibility-5
- Accountability Opacity-2
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims8
- Direct axis claims6
- Coverage6/13
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
4 / 10 |
Scrivener is produced by Literature & Latte, a private software company rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
5 / 10 |
Scrivener is produced by Literature & Latte, a private software company rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
7 / 10 |
Scrivener is produced by Literature & Latte, a private software company rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
Scrivener is produced by Literature & Latte, a private software company rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
5 / 7 |
Scrivener is produced by Literature & Latte, a private software company rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
Scrivener is produced by Literature & Latte, a private software company rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 |
Scrivener is produced by Literature & Latte, a private software company rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
Scrivener provides long-form writing software for authors, academics, screenwriters, and other writers. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
4 / 5 |
Scrivener is produced by Literature & Latte, a private software company rather than author-owned infrastructure. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Reversibility
?
Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders,
founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather
than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
The tool depends on proprietary maintenance and platform compatibility. Linked evidence
|
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability
structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
|
-2 |
Internal economics and roadmap are not fully transparent. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
2 / 3 |
Scrivener provides durable professional writing value at a straightforward software price. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
2 / 3 |
Literature & Latte publishes clear software pricing. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 63/100
8 verified linked claims 6 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 6/13 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
8 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 6/18
6 direct claims across 13 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
6/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1Scrivener is produced by Literature & Latte, a private software company rather than author-owned infrastructure.
- ScrivenerGeneral web source · 58%
- Literature & LatteGeneral web source · 58%
2Scrivener provides long-form writing software for authors, academics, screenwriters, and other writers.
- ScrivenerGeneral web source · 58%
- Literature & LatteGeneral web source · 58%
3Scrivener is low-capture because it sells a tool rather than controlling rights, distribution, or royalties.
- ScrivenerGeneral web source · 58%
- Literature & LatteGeneral web source · 58%
4Scrivener provides durable professional writing value at a straightforward software price.
- ScrivenerGeneral web source · 58%
- Literature & LatteGeneral web source · 58%
5Literature & Latte publishes clear software pricing.
- ScrivenerGeneral web source · 58%
- Literature & LatteGeneral web source · 58%
6The tool depends on proprietary maintenance and platform compatibility.
- ScrivenerGeneral web source · 58%
- Literature & LatteGeneral web source · 58%
7Internal economics and roadmap are not fully transparent.
- ScrivenerGeneral web source · 58%
- Literature & LatteGeneral web source · 58%
8Scrivener / Literature & Latte's public materials state a mission, values, ownership model, advocacy role, or institutional standpoint plainly enough that this record does not identify penalty-level neutrality theater.
- Scrivener / Literature & Latte official siteGeneral web source · 58%
- Literature & LatteGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Scrivener / Literature & Latte Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log