family-owned publishing group

Holtzbrinck Publishing Group

A family-owned publishing group behind Macmillan, Springer Nature interests, Digital Science, and other publishing and research businesses. It has meaningful editorial and scholarly infrastructure, but control is family-concentrated rather than democratically accountable to authors, workers, libraries, or readers.

Why this matters: Macmillan's profile should be read with the family-holding structure of Holtzbrinck in view.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 12, 2026

Final Score 16* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE16 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material24

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap24

Penalties-8

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.

Strengths

Product Integrity4/5
Extraction3/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed3/7

Penalties

Reversibility-5
Accountability Opacity-2
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims12
Direct axis claims12
Coverage12/12

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. On Ownership, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. On Governance, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. On Extraction, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group belongs in the lower-middle tier: the parent has useful operating capacity, but the structure still concentrates decisive power away from subsidiary workers, customers, readers, users, or communities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. On Labor Sovereignty, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	3 / 7	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group belongs in the lower-middle tier: the parent has useful operating capacity, but the structure still concentrates decisive power away from subsidiary workers, customers, readers, users, or communities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's linked public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's linked public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group belongs in the lower-middle tier: the parent has useful operating capacity, but the structure still concentrates decisive power away from subsidiary workers, customers, readers, users, or communities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. On Market Conduct, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. On Product Integrity, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group belongs in the lower-middle tier: the parent has useful operating capacity, but the structure still concentrates decisive power away from subsidiary workers, customers, readers, users, or communities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. On Scale Integrity, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group belongs in the lower-middle tier: the parent has useful operating capacity, but the structure still concentrates decisive power away from subsidiary workers, customers, readers, users, or communities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Reversibility directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Reversibility directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. This warrants a Reversibility penalty because parent control makes the cited risk materially relevant across owned brands, portfolio companies, users, customers, workers, or public institutions. The penalty is calibrated to the severity of that parent-level exposure rather than imported mechanically from any one subsidiary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Reversibility directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. [10]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Accountability Opacity directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product… Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Accountability Opacity directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. This warrants a Accountability Opacity penalty because parent control makes the cited risk materially relevant across owned brands, portfolio companies, users, customers, workers, or public institutions. The penalty is calibrated to the severity of that parent-level exposure rather than imported mechanically from any one subsidiary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Accountability Opacity directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. [11]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Ideological Disavowal directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product… Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Ideological Disavowal directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. This warrants a Ideological Disavowal penalty because parent control makes the cited risk materially relevant across owned brands, portfolio companies, users, customers, workers, or public institutions. The penalty is calibrated to the severity of that parent-level exposure rather than imported mechanically from any one subsidiary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Ideological Disavowal directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. [12]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 81/100

12 verified linked claims 12 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 12/12 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

12 verified linked claims

Source quality 11/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

12 direct claims across 12 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

12/12 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Holtzbrinck Publishing Group is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Holtzbrinck Publishing GroupGeneral web source · 58%

2Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Holtzbrinck Publishing GroupGeneral web source · 58%

3Holtzbrinck Publishing Group controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Holtzbrinck Publishing GroupGeneral web source · 58%

4Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy.

Labor Sovereignty Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Holtzbrinck Publishing GroupGeneral web source · 58%

5Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Macmillan aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

6Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Holtzbrinck Publishing GroupGeneral web source · 58%

7Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Macmillan aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

8Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Macmillan aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

9Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Holtzbrinck Publishing GroupGeneral web source · 58%

10Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Reversibility directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Macmillan aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

11Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Accountability Opacity directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Macmillan aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

12Holtzbrinck Publishing Group's public parent-level model makes Ideological Disavowal directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Macmillan aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD56 AK Press worker-owned independent book publisher and distributor · same market AGOOD56 Ghost Foundation nonprofit open-source publishing platform · same market BQUALIFIED49 Alliance of Independent Authors nonprofit independent-author association and watchdog · same market BQUALIFIED48 Autonomous Press worker-owned independent book publisher · same market BQUALIFIED47 Island Press nonprofit environmental book publisher · same market BQUALIFIED47 The New Press nonprofit public-interest book publisher · same market BQUALIFIED46 Haymarket Books nonprofit independent publisher · same market BQUALIFIED43 PM Press independent radical book publisher · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Holtzbrinck Publishing Group Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log