independent board-game publisher

Leder Games

An independent board-game publisher known for Root, Oath, Fort, Vast, Ahoy, and Arcs, with a focus on durable asymmetric games. Leder Games scores well because the model leaves more value with stakeholders and the institution is less hostile to people with weak bargaining power, though ecological harm and ideological disavowal still limits the evaluation.

Why this matters: Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability.

Letter grade B Qualified Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 7, 2026

Final Score 46* B - Qualified

BQUALIFIED46 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material45

Bonus+3

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap48

Penalties-2

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

B - Qualified

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Extraction7/10
Governance5/10
Labor Sovereignty5/7

Penalties

Ecological Harm-1
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims7
Direct axis claims6
Coverage6/13

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	4 / 10	Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Leder Games in the middle of Ownership: there is some mission, member, producer, or public-interest constraint, but decisive control is not fully democratic. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	5 / 10	Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Leder Games in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	7 / 10	Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Leder Games in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	5 / 7	Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Leder Games in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	5 / 7	Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Leder Games in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	5 / 7	Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. That places Leder Games in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. That places Leder Games high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [3]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence context Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. [1] context Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. [2] context Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-1	Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [6]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Leder Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Leder Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise,… Leder Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Leder Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Leder Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Leder Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [7]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	2 / 3	Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. That supports partial Good Deal credit because ordinary users receive unusually fair value, durability, access, or surplus. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [4]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. That supports partial Cost Transparency credit because pricing, margins, fees, funding, or surplus allocation are made meaningfully legible. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Board-game and good-video-game follow-up; compare against The Game Crafter, Stonemaier, Leder, Supergiant, Larian, major publishers, and Asmodee-owned studios. Uncertainty Focused follow-up; later review should add more labor, supply-chain, financial, and player-community evidence. Linked evidence Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability. [5]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 65/100

7 verified linked claims 6 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 6/13 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

7 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 6/18

6 direct claims across 13 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 5/10

6/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Leder Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Leder Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Leder Games official storeGeneral web source · 58%

2Leder Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Leder Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Leder Games official storeGeneral web source · 58%

3Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability.

Calculation Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Leder Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Leder Games official storeGeneral web source · 58%

4Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Leder Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Leder Games official storeGeneral web source · 58%

5Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Leder Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Leder Games official storeGeneral web source · 58%

6Leder Games is a B-level board-game publisher: unusually high product integrity and creator-led design culture, without democratic ownership or full public accountability.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Leder Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Leder Games official storeGeneral web source · 58%

7Leder Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Leder Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Leder Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Leder Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD63 Future Club employee-owned cooperative game studio · same market AGOOD63 KO_OP worker-owned game studio · same market AGOOD63 Motion Twin worker cooperative game studio · same market AGOOD61 Means Interactive cooperative game publisher · same market AGOOD56 Stocksy United artist cooperative platform · same market AGOOD52 itch.io independent game marketplace · same market AGOOD50 The Game Crafter independent tabletop game manufacturing marketplace · same market BQUALIFIED48 ConcernedApe independent game developer and publisher · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Leder Games Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log