high-control religious commune

People's Temple @ 1978

Jim Jones's People's Temple at the year of the Jonestown murder-suicide, after migration to Guyana and escalating coercive control. It scores at the floor because egalitarian and religious rhetoric collapsed into captivity, violence, murder, suicide pressure, and total charismatic domination.

Why this matters: People's Temple is a calibration point for a justice-coded religious movement becoming a coercive closed world.

Letter grade F Malignant High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 14, 2026

Final Score -84* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-84 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material2

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap2

Penalties-86

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Scale Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Coercive Violence.

Strengths

Scale Integrity2/5
Ownership0/10
Governance0/10

Penalties

Coercive Violence-25
Human Harm-20
Policy Capture-6
Debt Peonage-6

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims21
Direct axis claims21
Coverage21/21

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	0 / 10	No Ownership value is applied to People's Temple @ 1978 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 gave ordinary adherents, victims, or affected outsiders no real ownership control over the institution. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	0 / 10	No Governance value is applied to People's Temple @ 1978 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 concentrated rule in religious, ideological, military, or charismatic authority rather than democratic affected-stakeholder governance. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	0 / 10	No Extraction value is applied to People's Temple @ 1978 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 extracted labor, obedience, territory, property, money, or life chances from adherents or outsiders under coercive authority. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	0 / 7	No Labor Sovereignty value is applied to People's Temple @ 1978 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 subordinated ordinary work, obedience, family life, or bodily autonomy to institutional command. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	0 / 7	No Solidarity Unemployed value is applied to People's Temple @ 1978 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 treated outsiders, dissenters, apostates, enemies, or weak members as expendable rather than as people owed solidarity. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	0 / 7	No Loss Bearing Fidelity value is applied to People's Temple @ 1978 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 shifted loss onto members, victims, outsiders, or targeted communities rather than bearing institutional cost for repair. [6]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	0 / 5	No Market Conduct value is applied to People's Temple @ 1978 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 controlled participation through coercion, fear, identity, territory, or salvation claims rather than fair exchange. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	0 / 5	No Product Integrity value is applied to People's Temple @ 1978 on the current record. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978's institutional output degraded into domination, fear, or violence rather than reliable spiritual or public benefit. [8]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	People's Temple @ 1978 sits at 2 on Scale Integrity because people's Temple @ 1978's growth magnified coercion because scale expanded institutional reach over victims, adherents, or territory.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978's growth magnified coercion because scale expanded institutional reach over victims, adherents, or territory. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because people's Temple @ 1978's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or… People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because people's Temple @ 1978's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control. [10]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-20	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -20 on Human Harm because people's Temple culminated in mass death at Jonestown, including murdered children and coercive pressure around suicide.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple culminated in mass death at Jonestown, including murdered children and coercive pressure around suicide. [11]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-25	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -25 on Coercive Violence because people's Temple operated through armed guards, isolation, punishment, and coercive charismatic command rather than voluntary communal governance.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple operated through armed guards, isolation, punishment, and coercive charismatic command rather than voluntary communal governance. [12]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-2	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -2 on Ecological Harm because people's Temple @ 1978's ordinary institutional footprint is not central enough to drive Ecological Harm compared with fossil, chemical, war, or industrial-agriculture cases.. People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -2 on Ecological Harm because people's Temple @ 1978's ordinary institutional footprint is not central enough to drive Ecological Harm compared with fossil, chemical, war, or industrial-agriculture cases.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978's ordinary institutional footprint is not central enough to drive Ecological Harm compared with fossil, chemical, war, or industrial-agriculture cases. [13]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-6	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -6 on Policy Capture because people's Temple @ 1978 sought or exercised rule over law, territory, public order, or civic life through religious or ideological command.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 sought or exercised rule over law, territory, public order, or civic life through religious or ideological command. [14]
Debt Peonage ? Coercive or structurally inescapable debt systems, including bankruptcy-resistant student debt, compelled servicing relationships, wage or benefit garnishment leverage, distressed-debt buying, debt collection, or refinancing practices that turn education, medical care, housing, household necessity, or public obligation into long-term debtor control. Ordinary transparent lending is not penalized by itself. Range: -12 to 0.	-6	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -6 on Debt Peonage because people's Temple @ 1978's record in this pass does not show a core debtor-control model comparable with bankruptcy-resistant lending, debt collection, or compelled servicing systems.. People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -6 on Debt Peonage because people's Temple @ 1978's record in this pass does not show a core debtor-control model comparable with bankruptcy-resistant lending, debt collection, or compelled servicing systems.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978's record in this pass does not show a core debtor-control model comparable with bankruptcy-resistant lending, debt collection, or compelled servicing systems. [15]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -5 on Youth Capture because people's Temple @ 1978 serves or forms young people through religious education, youth ministry, schools, family culture,… People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -5 on Youth Capture because people's Temple @ 1978 serves or forms young people through religious education, youth ministry, schools, family culture, or identity formation; the scoring depends on whether that work becomes manipulative capture.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 serves or forms young people through religious education, youth ministry, schools, family culture, or identity formation; the scoring depends on whether that work becomes manipulative capture. [16]
Unilateral Terms ? Non-negotiable clickthrough or adhesion terms that turn ordinary customer, user, subscriber, patient, tenant, or public-facing access into a one-sided contract, especially forced arbitration, class-action or mass-action waivers, unilateral modification, venue restrictions, broad indemnity, account termination discretion, or essential-service access conditioned on unreadable terms. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -5 on Unilateral Terms because people's Temple @ 1978's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually.. People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -5 on Unilateral Terms because people's Temple @ 1978's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually. [17]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -2 on Accountability Opacity because people's Temple @ 1978's internal authority, violence, abuse, or decision-making was opaque to affected people and outsiders.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978's internal authority, violence, abuse, or decision-making was opaque to affected people and outsiders. [18]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -3 on Identity Capture because people's Temple fused racial-justice rhetoric, religious authority, political loyalty, family separation, and leader worship into total identity capture.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple fused racial-justice rhetoric, religious authority, political loyalty, family separation, and leader worship into total identity capture. [19]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -4 on Surveillance Capture because people's Temple @ 1978 used fear, informant dynamics, internal discipline, or coercive monitoring rather than open civic accountability.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 used fear, informant dynamics, internal discipline, or coercive monitoring rather than open civic accountability. [20]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -3 on Ideological Disavowal because people's Temple @ 1978 justified domination as sacred truth, purity, salvation, order, or necessity rather than admitting institutional interest and coercion.. People's Temple @ 1978 is penalized at -3 on Ideological Disavowal because people's Temple @ 1978 justified domination as sacred truth, purity, salvation, order, or necessity rather than admitting institutional interest and coercion.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence People's Temple @ 1978 justified domination as sacred truth, purity, salvation, order, or necessity rather than admitting institutional interest and coercion. [21]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 91/100

21 verified linked claims 21 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 21/21 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 20/20

21 verified linked claims

Source quality 18/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

21 direct claims across 21 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 14, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

21/21 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1People's Temple @ 1978 gave ordinary adherents, victims, or affected outsiders no real ownership control over the institution.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

2People's Temple @ 1978 concentrated rule in religious, ideological, military, or charismatic authority rather than democratic affected-stakeholder governance.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

3People's Temple @ 1978 extracted labor, obedience, territory, property, money, or life chances from adherents or outsiders under coercive authority.

Extraction Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

4People's Temple @ 1978 subordinated ordinary work, obedience, family life, or bodily autonomy to institutional command.

Labor Sovereignty Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

5People's Temple @ 1978 treated outsiders, dissenters, apostates, enemies, or weak members as expendable rather than as people owed solidarity.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

6People's Temple @ 1978 shifted loss onto members, victims, outsiders, or targeted communities rather than bearing institutional cost for repair.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

7People's Temple @ 1978 controlled participation through coercion, fear, identity, territory, or salvation claims rather than fair exchange.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

8People's Temple @ 1978's institutional output degraded into domination, fear, or violence rather than reliable spiritual or public benefit.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

9People's Temple @ 1978's growth magnified coercion because scale expanded institutional reach over victims, adherents, or territory.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

10People's Temple @ 1978's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.

Reversibility Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

11People's Temple culminated in mass death at Jonestown, including murdered children and coercive pressure around suicide.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

12People's Temple operated through armed guards, isolation, punishment, and coercive charismatic command rather than voluntary communal governance.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

13People's Temple @ 1978's ordinary institutional footprint is not central enough to drive Ecological Harm compared with fossil, chemical, war, or industrial-agriculture cases.

Ecological Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

14People's Temple @ 1978 sought or exercised rule over law, territory, public order, or civic life through religious or ideological command.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

15People's Temple @ 1978's record in this pass does not show a core debtor-control model comparable with bankruptcy-resistant lending, debt collection, or compelled servicing systems.

Debt Peonage Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

16People's Temple @ 1978 serves or forms young people through religious education, youth ministry, schools, family culture, or identity formation; the scoring depends on whether that work becomes manipulative capture.

Youth Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

17People's Temple @ 1978's members, staff, clergy, or service recipients may face institution-set rules, covenants, or moral terms that are not negotiated individually.

Unilateral Terms Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

18People's Temple @ 1978's internal authority, violence, abuse, or decision-making was opaque to affected people and outsiders.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

19People's Temple fused racial-justice rhetoric, religious authority, political loyalty, family separation, and leader worship into total identity capture.

Identity Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

20People's Temple @ 1978 used fear, informant dynamics, internal discipline, or coercive monitoring rather than open civic accountability.

Surveillance Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

21People's Temple @ 1978 justified domination as sacred truth, purity, salvation, order, or necessity rather than admitting institutional interest and coercion.

Ideological Disavowal Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Britannica: People's TempleGeneral web source · 58%
FBI: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%
National Archives: JonestownPrimary public record · 100%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD62 Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 civil resistance network · same market AGOOD58 Mondragon Cooperative Movement @ 1956 worker cooperative founding movement · same market AGOOD58 Solidarity Poland @ 1980 independent trade union movement · same market BQUALIFIED44 Haitian Revolution @ 1804 liberation movement and new state · same market CPERFORMATIVE35 New Deal United States @ 1935 reform government · same market DEXTRACTIVE31 Paris Commune @ 1871 revolutionary municipal government · same market FMALIGNANT-6 BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha @ 2021 Hindu religious organization · same market FMALIGNANT-30 Roman Empire @ 117 CE ancient empire · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for People's Temple @ 1978 Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log