public household and personal-care manufacturer

Procter & Gamble

A public consumer-goods giant selling household, hygiene, grooming, baby-care, laundry, and personal-care brands including Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Always, Crest, and Olay. P&G provides useful everyday goods, but shareholder control, plastic and chemical burdens, advertising power, and brand-mediated household dependence keep it low.

Why this matters: P&G is a default competitor behind many ordinary household purchases, so consumers need it as a baseline against cooperatives, private-label goods, and lower-harm manufacturers.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 11, 2026

Final Score -8* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-8 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material14

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap14

Penalties-22

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.

Strengths

Product Integrity3/5
Extraction2/10
Market Conduct2/5

Penalties

Policy Capture-5
Ecological Harm-3
Animal Testing-3
Toxic Products-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims12
Direct axis claims12
Coverage12/18

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution. P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution. That keeps Procter & Gamble low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. That keeps Procter & Gamble low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. [2] context P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution. [1] context P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. That keeps Procter & Gamble low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. [2] context P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution. [1] context P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. That keeps Procter & Gamble low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. [2] context P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution. [1] context P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. That keeps Procter & Gamble low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. [2] context P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution. [1] context P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	1 / 7	P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. That keeps Procter & Gamble low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. [2] context P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution. [1] context P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics. P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics. That places Procter & Gamble in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. That places Procter & Gamble in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. [2]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. That places Procter & Gamble in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence. [2] context P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution. [1] context P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-3	P&G’s product mix depends on large-scale packaging, paper, chemicals, water, shipping, and disposable goods, creating material environmental burden even where sustainability programs exist. P&G’s product mix depends on large-scale packaging, paper, chemicals, water, shipping, and disposable goods, creating material environmental burden even where sustainability programs exist. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence P&G’s product mix depends on large-scale packaging, paper, chemicals, water, shipping, and disposable goods, creating material environmental burden even where sustainability programs exist. [4]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-5	OpenLobby records PROCTER & GAMBLE lobbying on tax, trade, consumer product safety, transportation, budget, disaster planning, and other issues with about $1.6M in spending across 32… OpenLobby records PROCTER & GAMBLE lobbying on tax, trade, consumer product safety, transportation, budget, disaster planning, and other issues with about $1.6M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a limited Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records PROCTER & GAMBLE lobbying on tax, trade, consumer product safety, transportation, budget, disaster planning, and other issues with about $1.6M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [11]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Cleaning, fragrance, personal-care, grooming, diaper, and household-chemical products create ingredient and exposure risks that ordinary shoppers cannot fully evaluate at purchase time. Cleaning, fragrance, personal-care, grooming, diaper, and household-chemical products create ingredient and exposure risks that ordinary shoppers cannot fully evaluate at purchase time. That warrants a substantial Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence Cleaning, fragrance, personal-care, grooming, diaper, and household-chemical products create ingredient and exposure risks that ordinary shoppers cannot fully evaluate at purchase time. [5]
Animal Testing ? Direct animal testing, contract animal testing, animal-testing-dependent product development, or business lines where current safety/regulatory approval normally relies on animal experiments. Stronger penalties apply where animal testing is core, repeated, non-optional, or avoidable; documented cruelty-free or non-animal methods reduce or eliminate the penalty. Range: -8 to 0.	-3	Cosmetics, beauty, personal-care, and household-product businesses have material animal-testing exposure through product and ingredient safety systems. Linked evidence Procter & Gamble has cosmetics/personal-care sector exposure animal-testing exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public consumer-goods giant selling household, hygiene, grooming, baby-care, laundry, and personal-care brands including Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Always, Crest, and Olay. P&G provides useful everyday goods, but shareh… [12]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	P&G sells family, baby, grooming, and puberty-related brands that reach children, parents, and youth identity formation through advertising and household routines. P&G sells family, baby, grooming, and puberty-related brands that reach children, parents, and youth identity formation through advertising and household routines. That warrants a substantial Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence P&G sells family, baby, grooming, and puberty-related brands that reach children, parents, and youth identity formation through advertising and household routines. [6]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	P&G’s real product costs are hard to read because ingredients, fragrance systems, supply chains, advertising effects, and category pricing are spread across many brands and documents. P&G’s real product costs are hard to read because ingredients, fragrance systems, supply chains, advertising effects, and category pricing are spread across many brands and documents. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence P&G’s real product costs are hard to read because ingredients, fragrance systems, supply chains, advertising effects, and category pricing are spread across many brands and documents. [7]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	P&G’s brand portfolio turns ordinary hygiene, beauty, parenting, and household cleaning into loyalty and self-presentation cues rather than plain commodity purchases. P&G’s brand portfolio turns ordinary hygiene, beauty, parenting, and household cleaning into loyalty and self-presentation cues rather than plain commodity purchases. That warrants a substantial Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence P&G’s brand portfolio turns ordinary hygiene, beauty, parenting, and household cleaning into loyalty and self-presentation cues rather than plain commodity purchases. [8]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	P&G privacy materials cover online, app, account, advertising, and consumer-interaction data, giving the company behavioral data around household and personal-care purchases. P&G privacy materials cover online, app, account, advertising, and consumer-interaction data, giving the company behavioral data around household and personal-care purchases. That warrants a substantial Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence P&G privacy materials cover online, app, account, advertising, and consumer-interaction data, giving the company behavioral data around household and personal-care purchases. [9]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	P&G presents mass brand management and household-consumption shaping as ordinary neutral consumer service, while the underlying advertising and market power are institutional choices. P&G presents mass brand management and household-consumption shaping as ordinary neutral consumer service, while the underlying advertising and market power are institutional choices. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence P&G presents mass brand management and household-consumption shaping as ordinary neutral consumer service, while the underlying advertising and market power are institutional choices. [10]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 75/100

12 verified linked claims 12 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 12/18 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

12 verified linked claims

Source quality 17/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

12 direct claims across 18 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 7/10

12/18 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1P&G is a publicly traded shareholder-governed company, so consumers, workers, parents, and households affected by its products do not control the institution.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

2P&G sells high-utility household and personal-care brands across laundry, diapers, grooming, oral care, paper, and cleaning, making it practically useful but deeply embedded in branded consumer dependence.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

3P&G competes through dominant brands, advertising, shelf power, and category leadership, which gives it more leverage than ordinary customers have when comparing household basics.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

4P&G’s product mix depends on large-scale packaging, paper, chemicals, water, shipping, and disposable goods, creating material environmental burden even where sustainability programs exist.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

5Cleaning, fragrance, personal-care, grooming, diaper, and household-chemical products create ingredient and exposure risks that ordinary shoppers cannot fully evaluate at purchase time.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

6P&G sells family, baby, grooming, and puberty-related brands that reach children, parents, and youth identity formation through advertising and household routines.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

7P&G’s real product costs are hard to read because ingredients, fragrance systems, supply chains, advertising effects, and category pricing are spread across many brands and documents.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

8P&G’s brand portfolio turns ordinary hygiene, beauty, parenting, and household cleaning into loyalty and self-presentation cues rather than plain commodity purchases.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

9P&G privacy materials cover online, app, account, advertising, and consumer-interaction data, giving the company behavioral data around household and personal-care purchases.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

10P&G presents mass brand management and household-consumption shaping as ordinary neutral consumer service, while the underlying advertising and market power are institutional choices.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

P&G 2025 annual reportPrimary public record · 100%
P&G privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
P&G brandsGeneral web source · 58%

11OpenLobby records PROCTER & GAMBLE lobbying on tax, trade, consumer product safety, transportation, budget, disaster planning, and other issues with about $1.6M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — PROCTER & GAMBLE lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

12Procter & Gamble has cosmetics/personal-care sector exposure animal-testing exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public consumer-goods giant selling household, hygiene, grooming, baby-care, laundry, and personal-care brands including Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Always, Crest, and Olay. P&G provides useful everyday goods, but shareh…

Animal Testing Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 11, 2026

Procter & Gamble public siteGeneral web source · 58%
FDA: Animal Testing & CosmeticsPrimary public record · 100%

Alternatives

AGOOD58 Isthmus Engineering worker cooperative engineering firm · same market AGOOD55 New Era Windows worker cooperative manufacturer · same market BQUALIFIED49 MONDRAGON Corporation cooperative federation · Spain BQUALIFIED42 Scott Bader commonwealth-owned chemical company · United Kingdom

Competitors

AGOOD58 Isthmus Engineering worker cooperative engineering firm · same market AGOOD55 New Era Windows worker cooperative manufacturer · same market DEXTRACTIVE33 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories employee-owned engineering company · same market DEXTRACTIVE23 Recology employee-owned resource recovery company · same market DEXTRACTIVE12 W. L. Gore & Associates private employee-owned company · same market DEXTRACTIVE9 Henkel public consumer brands and adhesives company · same market DEXTRACTIVE5 Church & Dwight public household and personal-care manufacturer · same market DEXTRACTIVE5 Colgate-Palmolive public oral-care and consumer-products company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Procter & Gamble Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log