public entertainment and pachinko holding company

Sega Sammy Holdings

A Japanese public holding company spanning Sega games, entertainment, amusement, resorts, and pachinko/pachislot operations. Its creative products have real cultural value, but shareholder control, gambling-adjacent revenue, and youth-oriented entertainment keep the parent well below mission-locked alternatives.

Why this matters: SEGA's game output should be read with the broader Sega Sammy parent structure in view.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 12, 2026

Final Score 13* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE13 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material19

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap19

Penalties-6

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Youth Capture.

Strengths

Product Integrity4/5
Market Conduct3/5
Scale Integrity3/5

Penalties

Youth Capture-2
Identity Capture-2
Subscription Capture-1
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims13
Direct axis claims13
Coverage13/13

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. On Ownership, Sega Sammy Holdings belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. On Governance, Sega Sammy Holdings belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. On Extraction, Sega Sammy Holdings belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. On Labor Sovereignty, Sega Sammy Holdings belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	2 / 7	Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Sega Sammy Holdings belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	Sega Sammy Holdings's linked public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. Sega Sammy Holdings's linked public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Sega Sammy Holdings belongs near the bottom because parent ownership primarily serves shareholders, funds, families, executives, or individual owners. Any practical value at the subsidiary level does not become democratic control at the parent level. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. On Market Conduct, Sega Sammy Holdings belongs in the lower-middle tier: the parent has useful operating capacity, but the structure still concentrates decisive power away from subsidiary workers, customers, readers, users, or communities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. On Product Integrity, Sega Sammy Holdings belongs in the lower-middle tier: the parent has useful operating capacity, but the structure still concentrates decisive power away from subsidiary workers, customers, readers, users, or communities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] context Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. On Scale Integrity, Sega Sammy Holdings belongs in the lower-middle tier: the parent has useful operating capacity, but the structure still concentrates decisive power away from subsidiary workers, customers, readers, users, or communities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence context Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution. [1] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities. [2] context Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale. [3] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy. [4] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections. [5] context Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities. [6] context Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies. [7] context Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives. [8] Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Youth Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Youth Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. This warrants a Youth Capture penalty because parent control makes the cited risk materially relevant across owned brands, portfolio companies, users, customers, workers, or public institutions. The penalty is calibrated to the severity of that parent-level exposure rather than imported mechanically from any one subsidiary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Youth Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. [10]
Subscription Capture ? Manipulative recurring-payment, automatic-renewal, cancellation-friction, bundling, trial-conversion, or refund designs that profit from inertia or confusion. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Subscription Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Subscription Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. This warrants a Subscription Capture penalty because parent control makes the cited risk materially relevant across owned brands, portfolio companies, users, customers, workers, or public institutions. The penalty is calibrated to the severity of that parent-level exposure rather than imported mechanically from any one subsidiary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Subscription Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. [11]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Identity Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Identity Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. This warrants a Identity Capture penalty because parent control makes the cited risk materially relevant across owned brands, portfolio companies, users, customers, workers, or public institutions. The penalty is calibrated to the severity of that parent-level exposure rather than imported mechanically from any one subsidiary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Identity Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. [12]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Ideological Disavowal directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Ideological Disavowal directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. This warrants a Ideological Disavowal penalty because parent control makes the cited risk materially relevant across owned brands, portfolio companies, users, customers, workers, or public institutions. The penalty is calibrated to the severity of that parent-level exposure rather than imported mechanically from any one subsidiary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Parent and owner entities calibrated against listed subsidiaries, conglomerates, private-equity firms, public companies, and mission-locked alternatives. Linked evidence Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Ideological Disavowal directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines. [13]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 80/100

13 verified linked claims 13 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 13/13 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

13 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

13 direct claims across 13 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

13/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Sega Sammy Holdings is organized as the parent, owner, or controlling holding structure described in the linked public materials, not as a worker-, customer-, reader-, or public-governed institution.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy corporate siteGeneral web source · 58%

2Sega Sammy Holdings's public structure concentrates binding control in shareholders, family owners, funds, executives, or individual owners rather than the subsidiaries' workers, users, customers, or affected communities.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy corporate siteGeneral web source · 58%

3Sega Sammy Holdings controls or benefits from subsidiary, portfolio, platform, media, retail, insurance, finance, or franchise economics at parent scale.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy corporate siteGeneral web source · 58%

4Sega Sammy Holdings's public ownership model does not give ordinary workers across controlled subsidiaries binding democratic authority over parent strategy.

Labor Sovereignty Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy corporate siteGeneral web source · 58%

5Sega Sammy Holdings's parent-level structure creates ordinary corporate, investment, platform, or franchise exposure to layoffs, restructuring, divestitures, or weak exit protections.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy integrated reportGeneral web source · 58%

6Sega Sammy Holdings's public materials do not show a durable rule requiring parent owners or investors to absorb losses ahead of workers, customers, readers, users, or affected communities.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy corporate siteGeneral web source · 58%

7Sega Sammy Holdings's parent position gives it market, platform, brand, portfolio, distribution, data, or financing power over ordinary customers or subsidiary constituencies.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy integrated reportGeneral web source · 58%

8Sega Sammy Holdings's controlled businesses include products or services with real public or consumer utility, but that utility is filtered through parent-level control and monetization incentives.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy integrated reportGeneral web source · 58%

9Sega Sammy Holdings's scale makes parent-level decisions consequential for many people across subsidiaries, portfolio companies, customers, workers, or public institutions.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy corporate siteGeneral web source · 58%

10Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Youth Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy integrated reportGeneral web source · 58%

11Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Subscription Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines.

Subscription Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy integrated reportGeneral web source · 58%

12Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Identity Capture directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy integrated reportGeneral web source · 58%

13Sega Sammy Holdings's public parent-level model makes Ideological Disavowal directly relevant through owner dependence, investor control, policy influence, data power, product externalities, identity pressure, opacity, or harmful subsidiary business lines.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Sega Sammy integrated reportGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD63 Future Club employee-owned cooperative game studio · same market AGOOD63 KO_OP worker-owned game studio · same market AGOOD63 Motion Twin worker cooperative game studio · same market AGOOD61 Means Interactive cooperative game publisher · same market AGOOD52 itch.io independent game marketplace · same market BQUALIFIED48 ConcernedApe independent game developer and publisher · same market BQUALIFIED48 PlanToys sustainable wooden toy company · same market BQUALIFIED48 Supergiant Games independent video-game studio · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Sega Sammy Holdings Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log