independent board-game publisher
Stonemaier Games
Industry Entertainment
An independent board-game publisher known for Wingspan, Scythe, Viticulture, and other hobby games, with public stakeholder reports and direct community engagement. Stonemaier Games scores well because the model leaves more value with stakeholders and it bears more of the costs created by its work, though ecological harm and ideological disavowal still limits the evaluation.
Why this matters: Stonemaier is a B-level board-game anchor: strong product integrity, direct customer/community accountability, and unusual transparency for a private publisher, but ownership and governance are not democratically locked.
Letter grade B Qualified Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
B - Qualified
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.
Strengths
- Extraction7/10
- Loss-Bearing Fidelity6/7
- Governance5/10
Penalties
- Ecological Harm-1
- Ideological Disavowal-1
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims7
- Direct axis claims6
- Coverage6/13
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
4 / 10 |
Stonemaier Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
5 / 10 |
Stonemaier Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
7 / 10 |
Stonemaier Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
3 / 7 |
Stonemaier Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
4 / 7 |
Stonemaier Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
Stonemaier Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 |
Stonemaier Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
Stonemaier Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
5 / 5 |
Stonemaier Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Ecological Harm
?
Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale,
including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued
after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.
|
-1 |
Stonemaier is a B-level board-game anchor: strong product integrity, direct customer/community accountability, and unusual transparency for a private publisher, but not democratic ownership. Linked evidence
|
Ideological Disavowal
?
Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional
necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or
non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.
|
-1 |
Stonemaier Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Stonemaier Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through… Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
2 / 3 |
Stonemaier is a B-level board-game anchor: strong product integrity, direct customer/community accountability, and unusual transparency for a private publisher, but not democratic ownership. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
3 / 3 |
Stonemaier is a B-level board-game anchor: strong product integrity, direct customer/community accountability, and unusual transparency for a private publisher, but not democratic ownership. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 65/100
7 verified linked claims 6 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 6/13 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
7 verified linked claims
Source quality 12/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 6/18
6 direct claims across 13 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
6/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1Stonemaier Games has private company control rather than a verified worker/user democratic structure.
- Stonemaier Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- Stonemaier Games annual stakeholder reportsGeneral web source · 58%
2Stonemaier Games publishes or sells recognized board or video games with real play, craft, or hobby value.
- Stonemaier Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- Stonemaier Games annual stakeholder reportsGeneral web source · 58%
3Stonemaier is a B-level board-game anchor: strong product integrity, direct customer/community accountability, and unusual transparency for a private publisher, but not democratic ownership.
- Stonemaier Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- Stonemaier Games annual stakeholder reportsGeneral web source · 58%
4Stonemaier is a B-level board-game anchor: strong product integrity, direct customer/community accountability, and unusual transparency for a private publisher, but not democratic ownership.
- Stonemaier Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- Stonemaier Games annual stakeholder reportsGeneral web source · 58%
5Stonemaier is a B-level board-game anchor: strong product integrity, direct customer/community accountability, and unusual transparency for a private publisher, but not democratic ownership.
- Stonemaier Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- Stonemaier Games annual stakeholder reportsGeneral web source · 58%
6Stonemaier is a B-level board-game anchor: strong product integrity, direct customer/community accountability, and unusual transparency for a private publisher, but not democratic ownership.
- Stonemaier Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- Stonemaier Games annual stakeholder reportsGeneral web source · 58%
7Stonemaier Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Stonemaier Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.
- Stonemaier Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
- Stonemaier Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- Stonemaier Games annual stakeholder reportsGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Stonemaier Games Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log