public consumer goods and food company

Unilever

A public global consumer-goods company selling food, ice cream, beauty, personal-care, and household brands. Unilever has stronger sustainability language than many peers, but plastic packaging, sachets, palm and commodity exposure, brand power, and shareholder governance keep it low.

Why this matters: Unilever sits behind many grocery, beauty, hygiene, and food purchases, making it a direct comparison point for both multinational brands and smaller mission-driven alternatives.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 11, 2026

Final Score -12* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-12 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material17

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap17

Penalties-29

Private Government badge

Unilever receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $20.9M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [14]

Policy Capture: L for Lobbying

The L badge appears when the Policy Capture penalty is severe. Here, L stands for Lobbying: the policy-capture value is -10, meaning the evidence indicates major private-interest lobbying or policy pressure against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, democratic accountability, or ecological life.

Evidence: [11]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.

Strengths

Product Integrity3/5
Ownership2/10
Governance2/10

Penalties

Policy Capture-10
Ecological Harm-4
Animal Testing-3
High-Carbon Products-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims14
Direct axis claims13
Coverage13/19

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities. Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities. That keeps Unilever low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. That keeps Unilever low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. [2] context Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities. [1] context Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. That keeps Unilever low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. [2] context Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities. [1] context Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. That keeps Unilever low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. [2] context Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities. [1] context Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. That keeps Unilever low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. [2] context Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities. [1] context Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. That keeps Unilever low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. [2] context Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities. [1] context Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories. Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories. That places Unilever in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. That places Unilever in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. [2]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. That places Unilever in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems. [2] context Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities. [1] context Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-4	Unilever’s own reporting and Greenpeace criticism center plastic packaging, sachets, and commodity impacts as continuing environmental problems. Unilever’s own reporting and Greenpeace criticism center plastic packaging, sachets, and commodity impacts as continuing environmental problems. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Unilever’s own reporting and Greenpeace criticism center plastic packaging, sachets, and commodity impacts as continuing environmental problems. [4]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-10	OpenLobby records UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. lobbying on animals, trade, consumer product safety, commodities, environment, labor, and other issues with about $20.9M in spending across 37… OpenLobby records UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. lobbying on animals, trade, consumer product safety, commodities, environment, labor, and other issues with about $20.9M in spending across 37 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. lobbying on animals, trade, consumer product safety, commodities, environment, labor, and other issues with about $20.9M in spending across 37 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [11]
High-Carbon Products ? Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly. Range: -10 to 0.	-2	The company sells mixed grocery, restaurant, or packaged-food products where meat, dairy, refrigerated logistics, or high-carbon ingredients are material but not necessarily the entire business model. Linked evidence Unilever has mixed food exposure high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public global consumer-goods company selling food, ice cream, beauty, personal-care, and household brands. Unilever has stronger sustainability language than many peers, but plastic packaging, sachets, palm and commod… [12]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Personal-care, cleaning, fragrance, cosmetic, and processed-food products create ingredient, nutrition, and exposure risks that vary widely across the portfolio. Personal-care, cleaning, fragrance, cosmetic, and processed-food products create ingredient, nutrition, and exposure risks that vary widely across the portfolio. That warrants a substantial Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence Personal-care, cleaning, fragrance, cosmetic, and processed-food products create ingredient, nutrition, and exposure risks that vary widely across the portfolio. [5]
Animal Testing ? Direct animal testing, contract animal testing, animal-testing-dependent product development, or business lines where current safety/regulatory approval normally relies on animal experiments. Stronger penalties apply where animal testing is core, repeated, non-optional, or avoidable; documented cruelty-free or non-animal methods reduce or eliminate the penalty. Range: -8 to 0.	-3	Cosmetics, beauty, personal-care, and household-product businesses have material animal-testing exposure through product and ingredient safety systems. Linked evidence Unilever has cosmetics/personal-care sector exposure animal-testing exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public global consumer-goods company selling food, ice cream, beauty, personal-care, and household brands. Unilever has stronger sustainability language than many peers, but plastic packaging, sachets, palm and commod… [13]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Unilever brands reach youth and family consumption through beauty, deodorant, ice cream, food, and hygiene marketing. Unilever brands reach youth and family consumption through beauty, deodorant, ice cream, food, and hygiene marketing. That warrants a limited Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Unilever brands reach youth and family consumption through beauty, deodorant, ice cream, food, and hygiene marketing. [6]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Unilever’s true product impacts are difficult for shoppers to compare because supply chains, packaging, nutrition, ingredients, and brand ownership are spread across many categories. Unilever’s true product impacts are difficult for shoppers to compare because supply chains, packaging, nutrition, ingredients, and brand ownership are spread across many categories. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence Unilever’s true product impacts are difficult for shoppers to compare because supply chains, packaging, nutrition, ingredients, and brand ownership are spread across many categories. [7]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Beauty, hygiene, deodorant, and food brands such as Dove, Axe, and Ben & Jerry’s carry lifestyle and identity meanings beyond product function. Beauty, hygiene, deodorant, and food brands such as Dove, Axe, and Ben & Jerry’s carry lifestyle and identity meanings beyond product function. That warrants a substantial Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence Beauty, hygiene, deodorant, and food brands such as Dove, Axe, and Ben & Jerry’s carry lifestyle and identity meanings beyond product function. [8]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Unilever privacy notices cover consumer data collected through brand sites, promotions, digital advertising, and other interactions. Unilever privacy notices cover consumer data collected through brand sites, promotions, digital advertising, and other interactions. That warrants a substantial Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence Unilever privacy notices cover consumer data collected through brand sites, promotions, digital advertising, and other interactions. [9]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Unilever often frames brand purpose and sustainability as neutral responsible business while retaining the structural power of a shareholder-governed consumption machine. Unilever often frames brand purpose and sustainability as neutral responsible business while retaining the structural power of a shareholder-governed consumption machine. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Unilever often frames brand purpose and sustainability as neutral responsible business while retaining the structural power of a shareholder-governed consumption machine. [10]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 74/100

13 verified linked claims 13 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 13/19 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

13 verified linked claims

Source quality 15/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

13 direct claims across 19 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 7/10

13/19 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Unilever is a public shareholder-governed multinational, not a cooperative or user-governed producer of household necessities.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

2Unilever sells broadly useful food, hygiene, cleaning, and personal-care brands, but many products are discretionary, branded, or tied to intensive packaging systems.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

3Unilever uses global brand portfolios, advertising, distribution, and category management to shape consumer choice across food, hygiene, and beauty categories.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

4Unilever’s own reporting and Greenpeace criticism center plastic packaging, sachets, and commodity impacts as continuing environmental problems.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

5Personal-care, cleaning, fragrance, cosmetic, and processed-food products create ingredient, nutrition, and exposure risks that vary widely across the portfolio.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

6Unilever brands reach youth and family consumption through beauty, deodorant, ice cream, food, and hygiene marketing.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

7Unilever’s true product impacts are difficult for shoppers to compare because supply chains, packaging, nutrition, ingredients, and brand ownership are spread across many categories.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

8Beauty, hygiene, deodorant, and food brands such as Dove, Axe, and Ben & Jerry’s carry lifestyle and identity meanings beyond product function.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

9Unilever privacy notices cover consumer data collected through brand sites, promotions, digital advertising, and other interactions.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

10Unilever often frames brand purpose and sustainability as neutral responsible business while retaining the structural power of a shareholder-governed consumption machine.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Greenpeace reaction to Unilever Annual Report 2025Primary institutional record · 90%
Unilever privacy noticesGeneral web source · 58%

11OpenLobby records UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. lobbying on animals, trade, consumer product safety, commodities, environment, labor, and other issues with about $20.9M in spending across 37 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

12Unilever has mixed food exposure high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public global consumer-goods company selling food, ice cream, beauty, personal-care, and household brands. Unilever has stronger sustainability language than many peers, but plastic packaging, sachets, palm and commod…

High Carbon Products Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 11, 2026

Unilever public siteGeneral web source · 58%
Our World in Data: Environmental Impacts of Food ProductionGeneral web source · 58%

13Unilever has cosmetics/personal-care sector exposure animal-testing exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public global consumer-goods company selling food, ice cream, beauty, personal-care, and household brands. Unilever has stronger sustainability language than many peers, but plastic packaging, sachets, palm and commod…

Animal Testing Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 11, 2026

Unilever public siteGeneral web source · 58%
FDA: Animal Testing & CosmeticsPrimary public record · 100%

14Unilever receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $20.9M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

AGOOD58 Isthmus Engineering worker cooperative engineering firm · same market AGOOD55 New Era Windows worker cooperative manufacturer · same market BQUALIFIED49 MONDRAGON Corporation cooperative federation · Spain BQUALIFIED42 Scott Bader commonwealth-owned chemical company · United Kingdom

Competitors

AGOOD58 Isthmus Engineering worker cooperative engineering firm · same market AGOOD55 New Era Windows worker cooperative manufacturer · same market DEXTRACTIVE33 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories employee-owned engineering company · same market DEXTRACTIVE23 Recology employee-owned resource recovery company · same market DEXTRACTIVE12 W. L. Gore & Associates private employee-owned company · same market DEXTRACTIVE9 Henkel public consumer brands and adhesives company · same market DEXTRACTIVE5 Church & Dwight public household and personal-care manufacturer · same market DEXTRACTIVE5 Colgate-Palmolive public oral-care and consumer-products company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Unilever Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log