one-party state
People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966
Industry Historical
Mao-era China at the launch of the Cultural Revolution, mobilizing youth, party discipline, and ideological purification against perceived enemies. It scores as malignant because mass politics was routed through leader-centered coercion, social terror, and institutional destruction.
Why this matters: This is a calibration case for ideological mobilization becoming social domination.
Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
The L badge appears when the Policy Capture penalty is severe. Here, L stands for Lobbying: the policy-capture value is -12, meaning the evidence indicates major private-interest lobbying or policy pressure against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, democratic accountability, or ecological life.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
F - Malignant
The score turns mainly on Scale Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Coercive Violence.
Strengths
- Scale Integrity4/5
- Extraction1/10
- Solidarity with the Unemployed1/7
Penalties
- Coercive Violence-20
- Human Harm-14
- Policy Capture-12
- Debt Peonage-8
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims17
- Direct axis claims17
- Coverage16/19
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
0 / 10 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
0 / 10 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence |
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
1 / 10 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
0 / 7 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
1 / 7 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
0 / 7 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
1 / 5 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
1 / 5 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
4 / 5 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Human Harm
?
Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense,
reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to
0.
|
-14 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Coercive Violence
?
Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse,
armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or
nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to
confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.
|
-20 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Ecological Harm
?
Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale,
including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued
after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.
|
-6 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Policy Capture
?
Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes,
enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental,
healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy
against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or
ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely
because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.
|
-12 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Debt Peonage
?
Coercive or structurally inescapable debt systems, including
bankruptcy-resistant student debt, compelled servicing relationships,
wage or benefit garnishment leverage, distressed-debt buying, debt
collection, or refinancing practices that turn education, medical care,
housing, household necessity, or public obligation into long-term debtor
control. Ordinary transparent lending is not penalized by itself. Range:
-12 to 0.
|
-8 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Youth Capture
?
Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention
monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture,
surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure
consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself
penalized. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability
structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
|
-2 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Identity Capture
?
Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation.
Range: -3 to 0.
|
-3 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Surveillance Capture
?
Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial
recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of
customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Ideological Disavowal
?
Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional
necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or
non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.
|
-3 |
The year 1966 captures the moment leader authority turned youth and ideology into coercive instruments. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
No bonus credits applied in this version.
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 71/100
17 verified linked claims 17 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 16/19 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 14/20
17 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 9/18
17 direct claims across 19 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 8/10
16/19 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966: Britannica describes Mao launching the Cultural Revolution from 1966 to 1976.
- Britannica: Cultural RevolutionGeneral web source · 58%
2People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966: Britannica describes Mao's leadership and national trauma during the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution.
- Britannica: Mao Zedong and the Cultural RevolutionGeneral web source · 58%
3People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for extraction based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
4People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for solidarity unemployed based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
5People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for market conduct based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
6People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for product integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
7People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for scale integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
8People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for human harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
9People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for coercive violence based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
10People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for ecological harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
11People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for policy capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
12People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for debt peonage based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
13People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for youth capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
14People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for disclosure based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
15People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for identity capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
16People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for surveillance capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
17People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 has a year-specific historical finding for ideological disavowal based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.
- People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for People's Republic of China under Mao @ 1966 Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log