one-party state

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933

The Soviet Union at the peak of the Holodomor and forced collectivization catastrophe. The snapshot scores as malignant because state planning, grain control, coercive collectivization, and ideological denial combined into mass death.

Why this matters: This separates claimed worker rule from actual control over food, land, and survival.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 12, 2026

Final Score -77* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-77 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material8

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap8

Penalties-85

Policy Capture: L for Lobbying

The L badge appears when the Policy Capture penalty is severe. Here, L stands for Lobbying: the policy-capture value is -12, meaning the evidence indicates major private-interest lobbying or policy pressure against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, democratic accountability, or ecological life.

Evidence: [1] [2] [11]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Scale Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Coercive Violence.

Strengths

Scale Integrity4/5
Extraction1/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed1/7

Penalties

Coercive Violence-22
Human Harm-20
Policy Capture-12
Debt Peonage-10

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims16
Direct axis claims16
Coverage15/18

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	0 / 10	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Ownership, the snapshot leaves affected people with little binding control over the institution. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Uncertainty No separate axis-specific source was added for this zero/no-credit value in the historical snapshot pass. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	0 / 10	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Governance, the snapshot leaves affected people with little binding control over the institution. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Uncertainty No separate axis-specific source was added for this zero/no-credit value in the historical snapshot pass. Linked evidence Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	1 / 10	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Extraction, the snapshot leaves affected people with little binding control over the institution. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for extraction based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	0 / 7	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Labor Sovereignty, the snapshot leaves affected people with little binding control over the institution. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Uncertainty No separate axis-specific source was added for this zero/no-credit value in the historical snapshot pass. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, the snapshot leaves affected people with little binding control over the institution. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for solidarity unemployed based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [4]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	0 / 7	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, the snapshot leaves affected people with little binding control over the institution. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Uncertainty No separate axis-specific source was added for this zero/no-credit value in the historical snapshot pass. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Market Conduct, the snapshot leaves affected people with little binding control over the institution. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for market conduct based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [5]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	1 / 5	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Product Integrity, the snapshot leaves affected people with little binding control over the institution. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for product integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [6]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	4 / 5	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Scale Integrity, the snapshot shows real institutional capacity or public value, but power is still incomplete, unstable, or not directly answerable to affected people. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for scale integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [7]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-20	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Human Harm, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for human harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [8]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-22	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Coercive Violence, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for coercive violence based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [9]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-8	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Ecological Harm, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for ecological harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [10]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-12	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Policy Capture, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for policy capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [11]
Debt Peonage ? Coercive or structurally inescapable debt systems, including bankruptcy-resistant student debt, compelled servicing relationships, wage or benefit garnishment leverage, distressed-debt buying, debt collection, or refinancing practices that turn education, medical care, housing, household necessity, or public obligation into long-term debtor control. Ordinary transparent lending is not penalized by itself. Range: -12 to 0.	-10	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Debt Peonage, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for debt peonage based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [12]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Accountability Opacity, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for disclosure based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [13]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Identity Capture, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for identity capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [14]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Surveillance Capture, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for surveillance capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [15]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. The year 1933 is chosen because the famine peaked and the state still denied meaningful local control over food. It belongs near the floor because economic policy became a coercive system deciding who could eat. On Ideological Disavowal, the dated evidence identifies conduct serious enough for a penalty rather than a neutral no-finding. Compared with current directory entries, Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 is evaluated as a dated calibration case, so the year-specific facts control the score rather than the entity's whole reputation across centuries. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Historical calibration snapshot for 1933, compared with current and historical directory entries. Linked evidence context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933. [1] context Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths. [2] Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for ideological disavowal based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation. [16]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 71/100

16 verified linked claims 16 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/18 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

16 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

16 direct claims across 18 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 8/10

15/18 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes the Holodomor as a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Britannica: HolodomorGeneral web source · 58%

2Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933: Britannica describes forced collectivization from 1929 to 1933 and famine deaths.

Human Harm Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Britannica Money: CollectivizationGeneral web source · 58%

3Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for extraction based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

4Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for solidarity unemployed based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

5Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for market conduct based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

6Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for product integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

7Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for scale integrity based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

8Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for human harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

9Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for coercive violence based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Coercive Violence Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

10Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for ecological harm based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

11Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for policy capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

12Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for debt peonage based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Debt Peonage Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

13Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for disclosure based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

14Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for identity capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

15Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for surveillance capture based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

16Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 has a year-specific historical finding for ideological disavowal based on the dated profile sources and snapshot evaluation.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 historical profile sourceGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD62 Danish Civil Resistance @ 1943 civil resistance network · same market AGOOD58 Mondragon Cooperative Movement @ 1956 worker cooperative founding movement · same market AGOOD58 Solidarity Poland @ 1980 independent trade union movement · same market BQUALIFIED44 Haitian Revolution @ 1804 liberation movement and new state · same market CPERFORMATIVE35 New Deal United States @ 1935 reform government · same market DEXTRACTIVE31 Paris Commune @ 1871 revolutionary municipal government · same market FMALIGNANT-30 Roman Empire @ 117 CE ancient empire · same market FMALIGNANT-43 Ma Ba Tha @ 2017 Buddhist nationalist movement · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Soviet Union under Stalin @ 1933 Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log